THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK! THEFLAMEBOOK.COM
W0RKF / AA0IN - THE RETARD Ron Foster
450 Sunday Night Trivia
With your host Sue KD6UVD
8PM Pacific
Listen to 147.450 LIVE:
23,007 Entries
Comments: In reply to "Miss Piggy" who said: "Child molesting accusations have been leveled against Jimmy, BB, Ham Sandwich, Roger, Perry, Johnny PHX, OG, the Martin's, etc." I can't specifically remember any instance of such an allegation here, but I will take your word for it. To my knowledge, NONE of those people have ever been legitimately suspected of, charged with or convicted of any such act. In point of fact, I'm only aware of two instances of an amateur radio operator being legitimately convicted of a sex crime against a child; one I can't remember the call-sign, but he actually had his license revoked due to outcry from the amateur radio community [a 7-call, if I remember correctly], and the other was a 4-call who'd last resided in FL who'd been convicted both there and in Arizona [and was listed in the FL sex offender registry], and he'd been suspected of criminal sex acts in the US Virgin Islands as well. He, thankfully, has been dead for a number of years. He was a 14.300/14.313 critter, and would have been right at home on 435. In more recent years, another 14.313 scumbag, known for gleefully talking about how he planned to move to Puerto Rico or Jamaica and hook up with a "little Latina girl" [he was in his mid-60s at the time] was also charged with molesting his own stepdaughter, though that never went to trial. Because he felt he'd been railroaded - he said the ex-wife put the daughter up to the claim - he liked to go around calling others molesters. He, too, is dead and, if there's any cosmic justice, frying as we speak, lowlife that he was. "It's almost a default move on the repeater or Flamebook if you don't agree with someone." It actually seems to be something of a default attack across amateur radio, honestly. Frankly, I'm amazed that someone hasn't been successfully sued for it. Yes, legally amateur radio operators are limited purpose public figures, but it seems like a hard case to make that there is any way you can - absent a credible allegation, a criminal charge or a conviction - argue that you're NOT recklessly disregarding the truth if you accuse someone of being a child molester. "I am not sure if repeater chat or Flamebook postings are taken that seriously." Generally, they're not. And, like you said, some of these other people have been so accused - but apparently so infrequently that I don't recall the comments. By contrast, the "Snitchboi" spammer et al have made that false allegation about JMM dozens of times on this website - very likely while commenting using a VPN, TOR or some other sort of proxy server which masks their true IP address - and, obviously, without using their real name. Anyone who would stoop to falsely accusing a person of that most vile of criminal acts over an amateur radio dispute is a lowlife of the highest order.
Comments: Instead of having a pet when he was a kid.. Pat chose to have a KID as a pet.. Pat the "pet" o phile Pat loves "pets" https://images.app.goo.gl/kBE8v9g6EXWExk9g9
Comments: Child molesting accusations have been leveled against Jimmy, BB, Ham Sandwich, Roger, Perry, Johnny PHX, OG, the Martin's, etc. It's almost a default move on the repeater or Flamebook if you don't agree with someone. I am not sure if repeater chat or Flamebook postings are taken that seriously.
Comments: Cys fucks kids Pat sullivan fucks kids Democrats fuck kids Those that support democrats..fuck kids. Sit at home and fuck kids
Comments: I heard that Roger is living with Tommy and Tammi Prager.
Comments: **THE STEVE HOFFMAN ALLIANCE ** N6ZKZ - STEVE HOFFMAN IS A MODEL HAM.
Comments: haven't heard much from the Buttfuck Brothers lately. Did the Cocksuckers die of Corona Virus in their Winny-Gay-Go? Are these disgusting Bums still buttfucking each other every night? Someone catch a Goat for them! After they fuck it, they can eat it!
Comments: In reply to "Miss Piggy" who said: "Why Hammy Sammy do you only fight for one person that has been supposedly slandered on Flamebook. There are many on this platform that could be eligible for your defense and truth services. Ham Sandwich, Jimmy Houghton, Roger Bly, and many more have been accused of many of these similar allegations..." First off, I don't know KA6JMM personally - not that I'm sure that would matter - so your previous correspondent is - can you imagine? - not telling the truth. In point of fact I have spoken up before when people have crossed-the-line in reference to others; while I did so holding my nose, I spoke out when someone made disgusting comments about Roger Blight's young non-combatant daughter that had no place in the conversation. I don't know what's allegedly been said about "Ham Sandwich" who, like JMM, I don't know, and I don't believe his true identity is known. I wonder whether or not either he or Jimmy Houghten have ever been falsely accused of gross criminal acts like child molestation the way the "Snitchboi" spammer has often accused JMM of such - falsely. I'd like to think that if I was aware of such things, I would speak up in those instances as well.
Comments: Anyone else hear perry chimp-out on the gobblecock guy earlier? such a hood rat....
Comments: Just look at Mr Sammy’s answers. Too much personal insights. He knows KA6JMM all 2 well
Comments: Faggot ass old crying victim Dear steve... You know what to do.
Comments: Someone asked if "Buzz is T-hunting for SPARC?" Well the answer is YES and not only that he has various vehicles at various houses "under surveillance" at various times to see when they leave to go plant radios. Ever heard of GPS Bumper beacons? Not only is he that TALENTED but he is now in possession of EVERY Baofeng you have "misplaced" and will be selling them very soon on the Catalina Swap Net. Any other Dumb Stupid Questions?
Comments: Perry here. QST ***** ZKZ is my drug. 
Comments: Hiiiiiiiii Guuyyys K6MWT AND YOU'RE NOT 
Comments: Why Hammy Sammy do you only fight for one person that has been supposedly slandered on Flamebook. There are many on this platform that could be eligible for your defense and truth services. Ham Sandwich, Jimmy Houghton, Roger Bly, and many more have been accused of many of these similar allegations but they aren't out here with a protecting angel. Please answer in detail Hammy Sammy. I find some of your responses very vague and open ended. Thank you!
Comments: In reply to the peculiar comments of "The Dark Fleas", who said: "Note that in all of what Hammy Sammy wrote he offered no evidence whatsoever that the recordings are incorrect or fake." I find it interest that you state that I pen "decent responses", which you seemingly neither read - or read with comprehension - nor, generally, respond to substantively. As far as it concerns whether or not these particular recordings were "fake", my previous response to "Not the FCC" did not assert that those particular recordings were fake. What I did say was that audio provided in the past by the "Snitchboi" spammer was selectively edited - which it is and was. As for being "incorrect", within the context of the conversations I've been attempting to have with your "team" since March, it's incorrect to assert that any of the audio provided - most at my request - has either been "evidence" of any great wrongdoing on the part of JMM, or that it's been even slightly "provocative". When I think of poor operators, I think of audio such as that that was illustrated in all of those video captures I put up links to in my last response to your alleged associate the "Snitchboi" spammer; nothing either of you have offered amounts to anything more than the mundane, frankly boring conversation of average "good buddy" hams; there is nothing provocative or even controversial in anything audio you've attributed to JMM. In fact, I believe only the last few minutes of your capture which allegedly includes audio over seven different days - an average of just over three minutes per conversation - is JMM allegedly talking directly to a "squeaky", yet you only hear the squeaky in that conversation. So, not to put too fine a point on it, but for all you seem to believe that your alleged many hours of recordings of this obscure, seemingly harmless individual you're so obsessed with amounts to something, all I hear is relatively benign conversation of otherwise model hams who happen to occasionally address an unidentified operator for short a duration. Your work is the equivalent of a busybody neighbor standing outside with a camera watching his neighbor's grass grow, hoping to catch it at the point it grows beyond a certain height so you can bellow far and wide that your neighbor is violating an HOA rule, or perhaps some layabout with a stopwatch trying to catch people doing 40 MPH where it's marked 35, but behaving as though you have Epstein evidence. "All his efforts were directed at attacking our little team, calling names and other keyboard warrior tactics..." The only name which I referred to your "team" by in my previous post was your moniker, "the Dark Fleas". If you're complaining about my previous references to you as, "Dark Sleaze", do remember that members of your so-called "team" accuse people of, among other things, molesting children - falsely. You really are in no position to whine about name calling or these "keyboard warrior" tactics you're referring to; again I'll remind you that your "team" has spent more than half a decade using this site as a platform for defamation and harassment of a person who's greatest "sin" appears to be being highly boring. "The recordings are extremely solid samples of those four hams repeatedly violating part 97..." While exchanging with unidentified operators is a poor practice, the "solid" examples you've provided are, as I said, the equivalent of catching someone doing 40 in a 35 zone and are perhaps, the most ridiculous and petty things you could possibly complain about as far as it concerns violations of the rules or simply bad acting on a SoCal 2m/70cm repeater. When compared to the poor operating practices of, among others, those people singled out by callsign in the video captures I offered previously, these examples pale in comparison. "...and were chosen to show how a bad control operator can encourage others to ignore the rules. As a side note, the repeater owner first asked KA6JMM to step down as control operator. As JMM continued to talk to the squeakies as well as engage in other poor behavior the owner issued an edict that NO ONE was to communicate with the unidentified stations or they would be permanently banned. We have that recording too 😎." While we would find common ground on your initial point, if you're referring to the audio that was posted here recently at my request, then the edict not to communicate with unidentified stationed was issued NOT as a result of JMM or anyone else talking to a "squeaky", but to people on the W6CDW repeater - JMM mostly, but others as well - rightly having bad reactions to unidentified persons - persons who are a part of your "team" - maliciously interfering with the legal communications of licensed stations using vulgar, obscene recordings and whispering voices making homophobic comments about JMM. If you're attempting to assert that the problems on that repeater were due primarily to various operators there talking to "squeakies" while there was no other traffic on the repeater, as opposed to the activities of members of your "team" operating without benefit of call, maliciously interrupting the legal operations of all the legitimate users of that repeater during peak usage - specifically to harass and ridicule JMM - then you're simply being dishonest, and I suspect you know it. As for that final paragraph, there's not good reason to quote it; while you're correct in your assertions, you're also entirely hypocritical; you call out a minor infraction while, if not actively engaging in, support people and fail to call out people who have engaged in much more significant rule violations. There seems to be a lot of sarcasm in your couple of post so, again, I think you know that you're acting in a completely hypocritical way, and that you imagine you're somehow making a legitimate point against a person you have a highly irrational obsession with.
Comments: I want to get Jack onto the SPARC machine. Does he lack a radio and decent antenna? I can donate him a 75W mobile and a decent directional beam.
Comments: Not The FCC, Note that in all of what Hammy Sammy wrote he offered no evidence whatsoever that the recordings are incorrect or fake. All his efforts were directed at attacking our little team, calling names and other keyboard warrior tactics although if he wants to he can pen some decent responses. The recordings are extremely solid samples of those four hams repeatedly violating part 97 and were chosen to show how a bad control operator can encourage others to ignore the rules. As a side note, the repeater owner first asked KA6JMM to step down as control operator. As JMM continued to talk to the squeakies as well as engage in other poor behavior the owner issued an edict that NO ONE was to communicate with the unidentified stations or they would be permanently banned. We have that recording too 😎. Anyhow, JMM continued with his lack of self restraint and the repeater owner permanently banned him. A good example of firm and legal leadership! Antics such as those can be warning signs that you don’t want to be involved with those sorts of hams. Fortunately bad apples are not in the majority. You should find a good local club that is well organized and has online meetings such that you might match up faces and voices. See if there are folks with interests similar to yours and also move swiftly to eliminate bad apples. Let us know how you do.
Comments: Ham Sandwich hasn't posted out here for months. The fucking wordsmith hammy Sammy is a fraud. Go run your bullshit on some other Flamebook.
Comments: "Not The Fcc" The tapes sound legit to me. Hammy Sammy always asks for proof then immediately trashes whatever is offered. It's just his way of having fun but it's nuthin' serious if you read between the lines. Based on that FCC letter you offered you can see those four hams in the recordings are stupidly violating part 97 because they feel as if they are ID'ing themselves and that's good enough. If the FCC chooses to they could nail them. Anyhow, don't be discouraged by 4 bad hams. There's lots of great ones out there so stick with the hobby. |
| < Previous 20 | Next 20 > |
Back to THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK!