THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK! THEFLAMEBOOK.COM
W0RKF / AA0IN - THE RETARD Ron Foster
450 Sunday Night Trivia
With your host Sue KD6UVD
8PM Pacific
Listen to 147.450 LIVE:
23,007 Entries
Comments: Jimmys wife Karen is not suffering from dry vagina. Jimmy could no longer arouse Karen sexually thus the dryness. Karen is no beauty queen by any stretch of the imagination but still capable of attracting a sex partner with a better pay grade than Jimmy. Let us not mention the toddler sized penis Jimmy is equipped with. Perhaps Karen should post her rebuttal here on Flamebook for all to see.
Comments: Can we PLEASE get organized here and recruit Jimmy Houghton to 450 already!??!?! Don't you realize when Jimmy moves his radio up 15kHz that is the FINAL NAIL IN THE COFFIN FOR 435!!!! Please help jimmy evacuate Roger's communist repeater and seek refuge to real renegade radio machine!
Comments: KEEP AMERICA GREAT KEEP 435 OFF TIME IT OUT fuck that pedophile satanic skirt wearing faggot Roger bly the antifa and blm pedophile Skirt wearing faggot
Comments: I divorced Jimmy the Jackass because his cock is too small. Instead, I wanted to get fucked by a real man - Mike (KE6OG). -Karen
Comments: I’ve finally tracked down: - Gobblecock Guy - Squeaky 3 - The guy who says “Oh Buzz, I want to fill you with my load” Anyone else want to be added to my list? Keep doing shit on 435 and I’ll come give you a door knock. Buzz
Comments: Why is Hammy Sammy so fascinated with Karen's dry pussy? He should focus on the principle characters of 435. Thank you for your service OFFICER HOFFMAN. We strive to emulate your shining example.
Comments: O buzz he wants to put it in your butt buzz 1130 s peregrine pl anaheim o buzzz
Comments: It's been said that.... KARENS PUSS IS DRY I say again... KARENS PUSS IS DRY.... Does anyone have any information on that? KE6OG Mangled Mike from Los Alamitos
Comments: God bless n6zkz N6zkz is doing God's work on 435. On 450..hes schooling that newbie jackoff Hes truly a force for good Thank you for your service OFFICER HOFFMAN
Comments: But Jimmy also claims he has a new twenty-five year old "hottie"... Because, you know, that worked out so well for the Henry-Badger. Speaking of... is anyone who might be following the case against the good Lieutenant Kreuger able to provide an update on that matter?
Comments: Karen divorced Jimmy the Jackass. OG's wife is still with him. Fuck off Jimmy
Comments: In response to the faux Hammy Sammy aka the "Snitchboi" Spammer, who said: "Thank you for (indirectly) verifying what we have suspected. Our advice is that you dive deeper into what your "source" has presented to you as facts about some of the topics we've touched upon here." The make-believe world you inhabit must surely be an odd place... In addition to authoring posts ostensibly from JMM so that you can pretend he's here engaging you on the Flamebook, you now have me consulting [or is it "conspiring"?] with some third-party "source" you've conjured. I'm not sure which "facts" you're referring to when you allege that this imaginary source of yours is providing me information because, as per your standard operating procedure, you don't actually engage substantively, you don't legitimately "discuss" things in a reasonable, rational and respectful way and - and this is most important - you never provide anything that comes close to resembling proof of your many extraordinary claims. It's clear from your non-response that I landed many a killshot in my responses to your numerically listed topics, the most damaging being those to items 7 & 14 - which, lets be honest, are the only ones that came close to the heart of the matter. Since it's clear that you have no intention of engaging me in a serious discussion of these topics we've touched upon here, I reiterate my earlier advice to you to seek professional counseling to deal with your obvious obsessiveness, paranoid delusions, bigotry and whatever other mental defects plague the actual person cowering behind his [or her?] keyboard and Baofeng before you suffer any more serious real-life consequences - to the extent your previous claims weren't lies like so many others you've published here - along the lines of those you've hinted at dealing with due to your entirely absurd vendetta with the obscure [and, according to all available tangible, verifiable evidence, entirely harmless] amateur radio operator KA6JMM.
Comments: Whoever said "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself" probably never saw a group of rich white kids spray painting 'Black Lives Matter' on a statue of Gandhi.
Comments: Hammy Sammy, Thank you for (indirectly) verifying what we have suspected. Our advice is that you dive deeper into what your "source" has presented to you as facts about some of the topics we've touched upon here. All lies lead to the truth. Best regards, The other "Hammy Sammy" & Friends
Comments: I've noticed that the Faux Hammy Sammy doesn't pay any attention to the Original Anonymous SJW Hammy Sammy (OASJWHS). Just triggers OASJWHS' predictable rages and laughs at the spectacle....
Comments: Good grief the "Snitchboy" Spammer has been busy this AM... And wow, your list of nonsense is repetitive. Let's delve into some of these ridiculous whining points: "I thought I would share my tiresome and repetitive "Twenty Internet Debate Techniques For Defending KA6JMM" which I am sure of everyone on Flamebooke being so tired of:" I'm not sure how many people who use the FB actually care about this little back-and-forth between us, but if the alternative is your lame edited pictures of JMM with the homophobic commentary and obsession with gay sex acts or the disgusting pictures of obese bellies, I suspect they'll go with my comments - of which there has only been one this AM, despite your spam-posting with my name. "1. It has to be a HUGE post!" As I've said before, it should be of sufficient length to respond to the "argument" - to the extent your spam constitutes a legitimate argument - and to sufficiently hit all the relevant points. And, of course, I use the word "relevant" loosely so far as it concerns your remarks. "2. The post must total at least three screaming-for-attention screen scrolls and thousands of words." This from a person who has, over the past five years, spam-posted so great a volume of nonsense to this site that one can go pages seeing your own comments. Interestingly, but for maybe four comments on this page, and maybe one or two from others, this whole page and most of the last two are all your garbage. Oh, and perhaps one or two of the dark sleaze. "I love to parse and quote a few words entirely out of context" For instance? "It needs to be twice as long as those Ascii Dick Pics I used to post all the time." I have no concrete proof you - the "Snitchboi" Spammer - were the ASCII spammer from a couple of years back, though it wouldn't surprise me. "3. Deny, deny, deny! I get caught red handed but like any 3 year old I just deny over and over." I'm not sure exactly what you've caught me "red handed" doing. At least, in so far as you've actually proven anything you've claimed. It bears repeating that the only time you've ever made an attempt to prove something you've claimed - when you posted a few mundane audio clips at my request - they didn't come within an astronomical unit of proving any of your tall tales about JMM. "4. Defend KA6JMM in the most suspicious and vigorous way possible" I'm not sure there's anything "suspicious" about me asking for proof that he's engaged in any misdeeds you've accused him of - and you've failed spectacularly to prove even your silliest claims about him, such as that it's a demonstrable fact that he was responsible for "jamming" SPARC on the various occasions you've claimed that he was. "...yet at the same time I claim I don't know him and I don't live in the area, LOL!" I've been pretty clear in that I "know" him the exact same way you do - by reputation, and as a voice on the radio. I've never met him and I've never been in the same room as him. I wonder if he and I have ever actually been in the same State, though I suppose anything is possible. Also, the extent to which he and I "know" each other is entirely irrelevant as far as it concerns YOUR demonstrably false and unproven claims about him. "Talk about a creepy obsession!" Well, to my credit I've merely authored a handful of comments asking why it is that he lives rent free in your head - as he clearly does. People can label things as they will, but how that's "creepy" compared to a person who, among other things, travels who knows how far on numerous occasion to photograph another person's property and post pictures of it on the web along with numerous unsubstantiated if not demonstrably false allegations of criminal acts, I'm sure I don't know. The only reasonable explanation is that mentally defective people - such as yourself - rarely acknowledge their own defects, and often engage in the same sort of finger-pointing you do in an attempt to talk around their poor behavior. "People might think we are cyber lovers if I'm not careful." Careful, your displays of sexual dysfunction are becoming legion - much more than your dark sleaze. "5. I know KA6JMM SO WELL (but deny I know him in the same breath)" This sort of obfuscation borders on ridiculous. "...that I can declare he does not need to use this website but he is all over "social media"." You insist on claiming that he's using his website, going so far as to state which screen names he's using. I've yet to see a shred of proof from you that he's using any of those names, and plenty which indicates not only is he not the author of posts from those names, but that those posts are coming from you - the same way you're using "Hammy Sammy" and "Model Ham" to post comments. "6. Every Flamebook message from KA6JMM attacking BB & SPARC just can't be JMM so accuse someone else of authoring them." Please provide substantive proof that JMM is the author of any posts to this website. [That you say so doesn't constitute substantive proof]. "7. KA6JMM is well known for harassment and defamation of other hams..." Then you should have no problem illustrating that with some sort of concrete, unimpeachable evidence. Who, specifically, has he "harassed"? "Defamed"? What actions can you prove he's engaged in that cross the line of typical amateur radio back-and-forth into "harassment", and where are the charges and convictions for this behavior? What statements has he made that constitute "defamation"? Where were these statements recorded? Who has he made these statements against? As defamation has a clear legal definition, it would bolster your case to illustrate where he's been taken to court and found liable for such behavior. Please provide evidence. "...but declare any mocking of JMM as "cowardly"." I don't know about "any". Yours generally is. "Because I claim I don't live in SoCal how would I know his history anyhow?" You've heard the phrase, "He [or she] who asserts must prove". You're the person making claims that another party has engaged in criminal acts - including serious criminal acts like child molestation, not me. "Oh right, invoke the-"not on the Internet"-claim-makes-it-invalid even though the Internet does not truly encompass the sum of human experience and knowledge." I've never suggested that what you've alleged - with no proof whatsoever - couldn't be true simply because evidence of such can't be found on the internet. Go back to our earliest exchange; you'll find I said pretty much the exact opposite of that. The TRUE state of affairs is that you've provided NO PROOF WHATSOEVER of anything you've alleged against this man. That's saying nothing of how when you actually took the time to offer what in your mentally diseased mind was "proof" - a few meager, mundane sound clips - of your many and serious allegations, said "proof" didn't prove what you alleged. Not only that, when asked for proof, you not only take it as a personal insult, but you go out of your way to personally attack the person who dares you to ask. "8. Never offer any proof but DEMAND it at every turn, because, well, that is my right." What exactly do you want me to offer proof of? That JMM isn't here? That's pretty obvious. You're the one insisting that he is, yet you've failed to prove it. You're the one insisting he's engaged in some huge amount of, "harassment" [do you even know the legal definition of the word?], yet can't even bother to state who specifically he's "harassed" or what he said/did that constitutes "harassment". And no, legally, bloviating about how a certain person likes a certain restaurant isn't, "harassment". "9. Deflect by claiming I don't deflect, LOL!" That's two "LOLs" so far for you; we'll come back to that near the end. Anyone who isn't mentally defective can clearly see that not only am I not deflecting, I'm going to great lengths to respond to each and every point you try to make, no matter how irrelevant. "10. Create giant ridiculous posts..." Like the one I'm responding to? I understand it makes the post bigger, but about half of the post is me quoting you so that it can't be legitimately said that I'm ignoring or deflecting. "...but accuse others of not using Proof & Logic. I mean, answering sentence-by-sentence is logical and not obsessively anal, right?" Actually, answering line-by-line is entirely logical. Whatever else you might want to say, I'm showing you at least enough respect to answer you completely. You might try doing the same. But of course, you imagine yourself to be some superior sort of life-form, and too good for the usual pleasantries. After all, you imagine people you're harassing and defaming have some how done you wrong because they don't simply roll over and take it. JMM is a lesser being too, right? HOW DARE HE object to being followed from repeater to repeater and jammed with homophobic nonsense by an unidentified whisperer, right? And, honestly, HOW DARE HE have a problem with a creep on the internet following him around, taking pictures of his house, posting them on the internet and calling him a child molester, right? He's such a lesser life-form, he exists to be mistreated by superior beings like you in such ways, right? /sarc on all that, since I'm sure you didn't get it. "11. In the most ludicrous manner possible accuse others of not having a ham license, with no basis in fact" Right, clips of you doing it that you posted is, "no basis in fact". Oh, and where have you posted using your call? I must have missed it. I didn't miss you posting using OG's call, or JMMs. "...yet never ever offer up evidence of my own "call sign"." I'm under no obligation to publish my own letters. We're not on the air, I'm not pretending to be people I'm not and I'm not on tape jamming without benefit of call. "12. Use a tenet of my favorite book Mein Kampf..." It's interesting that you throw out appeals to emotion like that when the only person who attempted to throw out the word, "jewish" as an insult was you. "...repeat a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously"" Whatever else your lies about JMM et al may be, "colossal" is hardly the word I'd use. Well, at least they're not colossal to anyone else. You, personally, seem to allow him to occupy a colossal amount of real estate in your own mind. "13. When anyone copies my technique I will label it as lame appropriation and unrepentant lying." It's a demonstrable fact that you've lied; it's been pointed out and well illustrated, and bears no immediate rehashing. That's saying nothing of the claims you've made that are simply unsubstantiated - as well as unable to be substantiated. Yet you repeat them so often and with such fervor, and are so vehement in your personal attacks against those that dare question you, that you've elevated your mere unsubstantiated claims to gross falsehoods by yourself. "14. Keep trolling for information..." Ah, so we come to the heart of the matter; you really don't want anyone to know who you are. You're deathly afraid of it for some reason. Among other things that speaks to you not being a licensed amateur radio operator because they generally don't care if people know who they are. But that's a minor point. You've got some sort of secret that you just can't allow anyone to know, and whatever that secret is - it's very likely something no one would care about if they knew it, but it's REALLY important to you [another illustration of your overblown sense of self] - it's tightly wrapped up in this ridiculous vendetta. And you know that you can't prove ANYTHING you've said about JMM without giving up something that will expose you. Nevermind that JMM allegedly knows who you are, or so you've hinted at heavily, if not claimed outright. Is part of this whole nonsensical Flamebook-only grudge that he knows who you are, and doesn't consider you worthy of responding to even on this website few people take seriously? If so, I'm sure that's a huge blow to that ego. "...throw out the same baseless accusations in every sentence: no license, no privileges, jamming various amateur radio repeaters without IDing, etc." There's nothing baseless in any of those allegations, and the one about you jamming while not IDing is supported by audio you posted! "In one breath say someone doesn't have a license and in the next infer it must be a lesser license while hoping for a corrective response." So you're saying you're a licensed amateur radio operator of at least General Class? If so, you're using a lot of words to tell me that you're not interested in having a voice QSO to talk about your many and serious allegations about JMM because doing so would expose your identity as you'd have to ID on 20 to talk to me. "15. Repeatedly accuse others of "projecting" because, well, much like a cross-dressing Ham Radio Mary Poppins I am practically perfect in every way." The only cross-dresser in amateur radio that I'm aware of is Roger Blight, whom you defend constantly despite how poor of a steward he's been of 435 and how much of a dishonest, hypocritical individual he is. I suppose you see a kindred spirit in those traits. I wonder, are you kindred spirits in the cross dressing as well? "16. Repetitively invoke "libel"..." Right... because that's what it is when you falsely accuse people of child molestation. "...yet falsely accuse others of all sorts of heinous crimes without any proof." Do tell: what "heinous" crime have I "falsely" accused anyone of? "17. Yet again, invoke gross defamation..." See response to item 16. "...when I accuse others of jamming without a license..." Yet again, it bears repeating that you posted audio clips of yourself - wait for it - jamming without IDing your station. You also fail to discern that not only is it not "gross defamation" [it's not even defamation, seeing as how it's true] to state that a person is jamming without IDing when they posted audio of themselves jamming without IDing, there's a galaxy of difference between saying that someone is an unidentified jammer [even if it's not true which, in this case, it is] and accusing someone of molesting children. If you don't understand that very basic thing, you're even more of a mentally defective person than you've shown yourself to be with your ridiculous responses to me. "18. Spend hours and hours posting these giant screen wasters..." Heh... okay. One more time for those who haven't gotten it yet: five years+ and literally hundreds [if not thousands] of posts of either demonstrably false or unsubstantiated claims about JMM, many of them making claims of serious criminal activity with no basis in fact, posts commenting on following JMM around Wildomar and even out of state, claiming JMM has engaged in "stalking" [whatever that's supposed to mean to the claimant] while posting numerous pictures of his house and giving out all sorts of PI about him, countless GB of doctored image files mocking JMM for being overweight and homophobic commentary, countless allegations of "jamming" with not even an FCC warning letter, LRDF report or near field intercept to back up the claim or even amateur t-hunting data that might make your case vs... not even a couple of dozen posts of mine merely asking for the slightest shred of proof of any of it. "19. Be sure to liberally add "LOL" at the end of many sentences, LOL" Like you did three times in this bout of digital diarrhea?
Comments: Flamebook Admin, can you please "encourage" the absence of Hammy Sammy posts once again?
Comments: Do you notice that Perry ALWAYS refers to: - faggots - big black cock - sucking big black cock - other homosexual activities In psychology, that is known as projection. Perry, just admit that you’re gay and stop the charade. Hammy "Squeaky" Sammy
Comments: I (Hammy Sammy) didn't think it was possible for anyone to be more dishonest, or have less credibility than myself. Then, that ridiculous noose hoax occurred in NASCAR. Still, all of that pales in comparison to the dishonesty of me, the one and only Hammy Sammy, hateful-defaming-libelous spammer of Flamebook. That puts me (Hammy Sammy) in mind of something from antiquity... I've updated it for our times: FIRST I (Hammy Sammy) Wrote On Flamebook... First I (Hammy Sammy) wrote my lies about "Gobblecock" Richard Clark but other hams said nothing because they weren't Richard Clark Then I (Hammy Sammy) wrote my lies about Pat Sullivan but other hams said nothing because they weren't Pat Sullivan Next I (Hammy Sammy) wrote my lies about Roger Bly but other hams said nothing because they weren't Pat Sullivan Next I (Hammy Sammy) wrote my lies about Tommy Prager but other hams said nothing because they weren't Tommy Prager Next I (Hammy Sammy) wrote my lies about Chris Pulse but other hams said nothing because they weren't Chris Pulse Then they exposed my (Hammy Sammy) lies and hatred, but no one gives a shit about an anonymous hater like me, Hammy Sammy Stand against Hammy Sammy harassment! Stand against anonymous Hammy Sammy defamation! On-air silence is just silence without Hammy Sammy's jamming and Squeaky Voices. Ham lives don't matter to me while I (Hammy Sammy) spam my libel.
Comments: Does anyone read these rambling posts going back and forth between these obsessed verbal masterbators? |
| < Previous 20 | Next 20 > |
Back to THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK!