THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK! THEFLAMEBOOK.COM
W0RKF / AA0IN - THE RETARD Ron Foster
450 Sunday Night Trivia
With your host Sue KD6UVD
8PM Pacific
Listen to 147.450 LIVE:
23,008 Entries
Comments: I am so horny for u Jack hill I want you to eat my pussy https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5d51026f09186
Comments: I am Hammy Sammy I take myself very, very seriously Flamebook is a serious business All posts must meet my strict standards If you do not post according to my standards, look out! I have written my own theme song. Here are the lyrics: Hammy Sammy the Flamerbook Admin He's the one, in command Hammy Sammy the Flamerbook Admin His power lies in his hands Coz he's bigger than big Taller than tall Quicker than quick Stronger than strong Ready to fight for JMM, Against wrong Hammy Sammy Hammy Sammy Hammmmmy Sammmmmmmmmmyyyyyyyy You may respectfully sing them to this tune Or if you are a dick like Tommy taRd Prager the Dickies version is more appropriate for your ugly face
Comments: I WANT seXXXy back Don't want that Sammy Hammy HACK My guy's name is seXXXy Jack NOT Sammy Hammy HACK Handsome is N6MUR Gotta lure him into my car Away from Sammy Hammy HACK we'll drive far His name is seXXXy Jack Wanna do him from the back Flamebook should ban that Sammy Hammy HACK The only man I want is seXXXy JACK!!
Comments: LOL... the Iconic Geek Photo was offered not with the suggestion that it was a picture of KA6JMM, but to provide a better representation of his true technical prowess insofar as it concerns manipulating the internet. This, because the Flamebook spammer with a peculiar obsession with JMM has suggested that he has something on the order of a Doctor Strange level of ability to magically remove anything from the internet - other than this website - that may be negative. Please, don’t hurt yourself taking yourself too seriously.
Comments: It is sadly obvious this Hammy Sammy spammer lies out of his cunt. Can the Flamebook admin apply some HTML Vagisil to Hammy Sammy? At least JMM was polite when he lied.
Comments: I thought I would come clean and confess to one of my numerous lies, a perfect example of what a lying fuck I am. You see, I am SO desperate to shill for Richard Bebout KA6JMM at any cost I will start inventing Fake News. Yes, just like the liberal and biased MSM, I invent stories just to make it seem I know what the fuck I am talking about. For example, I salaciously said, straight-faced: "I'm pretty sure we've discussed the wholesale lack of independently verifiable evidence of most of what you've said about him in previous comments. To the extent you've addressed that matter, you've only suggested the ridiculous idea that he has some sort of mystic-level control over the internet such that he can make any and all criticism of him disappear - a power he obviously does not possess." Then I posted a photo as if it was really Richard Bebout at a younger age, smoking a cigarette and slouching in front of an old computer. I was triumphantly exclaiming that I was so great I easily found the purported photo of the Hunchback of Wildomar. FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE Here is the real source of the photo and the real name of the subject written about in a 2017 Wordpress blog article of a Mr. Bill Lawrence - https://billlawrenceonline.com/dave-aho-iconic-computer-geek/ "Dave Aho Iconic Computer Geek?" We have been informed that the computer geek of legend whose image has been flying around the World Wide Web since its birth is Dave Aho of New Hampshire. Here is the article that we ran in April. https://billlawrenceonline.com/iconic-computer-geek-mystery/ Here is the iconic photo: Iconic Computer Nerd Dave Aho The computer appears to be an IBM XT, which was produced from 1983 to 1987. The printer is dot matrix, the brand of which we can’t identify. The boxes contain 3M 5.25-inch floppy disks and there is a phone jack screwed to the wall presumably for a line for a dial-up modem. 
Here is Dave’s photo from his Facebook page. (has since been privatized)
Age 68
Mr David A Aho
Current Home Address:
++++++++ Rd
R****e NH
Signed: you need to know what a buffoonish liar I am,
Hammy "The LIAR" Sammy
Comments: I am very capable of conversing in a reasonable manner. I made an unmistakably lighthearted poke at you in a few sentences. You replied with a long and truly agonized stream of words about someone I (and probably others) could care less about. Someone who has precious little to do with what I made the jab about. I don't care if I was wrong about your abilities but your reply was in no way lighthearted. Your troupe of other Flamebook characters have been caustic fun but your "Hammy Sammy" persona has gone rogue. I'm going back to playing Morse Code with my awesome daughter. See ya!
Comments: Todays special feature: Ousting a rat that dares to jam Officer Hoffman. This puke can be heard in a high pitched faggity voice yelling, "go to bed steve" This rat also jams over high quality entertainment. His call is : KM6LJK THE HOFFMAN ALLIANCE WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGET WE DO NOT FORGIVE. EXPECT US
Comments: In reply to the phony "Hammy Sammy" aka the Flamebook spammer who typically comments with monikers using the terms "SnitchBoy" and "DarkSleaze" who said: > I get so vexatious that I start mixing in my other "H.S." alter-egos (Ham Sandwich) and commingle my hyperbolic methods of attack. I'm pretty sure I've already told you that I've never posted as "Ham Sandwich". As I told you yesterday, I discovered my earliest posts from approximately April of 2018 and vacillated between "Hammy Sammy" and "HAMB Sammich" for a brief time. But other than a few instances of commenting in obvious parody of "Francis" [as you yourself have, several times playing off of me to hilarious effect, FYI], the only other time I've been anything other than "Hammy Sammy" was the one or two times I posted a selection of comments from "90s Roger". So, yet again, you're spreading demonstrably false information - even after being shown that you're wrong. > I desperately wish to be the Flamebook White Knight for KA6JMM... I'm actually just looking for accurate information regarding this little thing you've had going on with him for at least the past half decade where you've followed him around on the air - and, so it seems, in person - and maliciously interfered with his legal amateur radio activities and those of the repeater user bases he's been a part of while, in cowardly fashion, disgusting your voice and not identifying your station while making - predominantly homophobic - comments indicative of sexual dysfunction. I'd prefer to stay on that topic - the way we did about a month ago in a brief exchange - but you want to behave like a horse's backside. > You see, I raptly listened to one recording of KA6JMM and conflated it in with another. Piously emulating a squawking Social Justice Warrior I immediately went on the attack. I've never considered that the _mere existence_ of the recordings incommodes KA6JMM no end, triggering rage fueled broadcasts on W6CDW. Just one of the many reasons Cliff Wallace banned KAJMM. Hmmmm... Well, I'm not sure how exactly that exposes anything "fawlty" with regard to my previous remarks. In point of fact, it doesn't actually address anything I said whatsoever. As far as the recordings themselves, yes they surely incommoded not only KA6JMM but all the legitimate, legal, licensed users of DCW, SPARC, 435, CLARA and any other repeaters where the "DarkSleaze" have followed him and played them [along with other illegal transmissions] in blatant violation of Part 97 rules. Obviously, that's of little import to you as you're an admitted rulebreaker - who hypocritically whines about "jamming" on the part of JMM and who for purposes of distraction takes issues with my criticisms of Roger Blight's poor stewardship of 435. And yes I'm sure Cliff became quite unhappy as your campaign of jamming and harassment escalated from early 2018 into early 2020, and it surely bothered JMM greatly - which is completely understandable. The problem - for you - is that you've entirely undermined your entire argument that the reason JMM is not welcome on those repeaters is due to to any poor operating practices on his part when the primary reason is that they simply didn't want to deal with a problem YOU and the maybe one or two co-conspirators in your group of DarkSleaze caused on those repeaters by jamming them with recordings, homophobic comments, in whispers and fake accents while failing to ID. The purpose of the discussion - to the extent you've grasped it - is to discover why - aside from mental disease or defect - anyone would waste that sort of time and energy on a decidedly pointless pursuit. > Why might anyone share recordings of KA6JMM's brain-belches if such clues would lead JMM back to them? Again, your comments make little sense; how would the mere existence of a recording lead anyone to anyone? Further, where did I suggest that it did? > Yet I, Hammy Sammy have already concluded JMM caught the owner of the recordings. I'm not sure in which of my posts I concluded that. If you're referring to the brief snippet you quoted, no such thing was suggested, nor was anything that could be even somewhat legitimately misconstrued as suggesting that. > I've previously defended JMM's broadcasted threats as innocent and unadulterated puffery... I don't recall defending a "threat" as puffery. I do recall suggesting that a some what tall-taleish sounding claim of finding discarded PI on a pizza box to be puffery, but I don't recall a "threat" in the audio in which that claim was recorded. You seem to have a very low bar for what constitutes a "threat", at least as far as it concerns others. That is curious [not to mention completely hypocritical] given your own comments [as "KA6JMM aka SnitchBoy"] of July 20, 2018 wherein you explicitly stated that if JMM did exactly what you seemingly were caught doing, which enabled him to follow you back to your trash heap [to the extent either of those claims are true], he'd receive a, "shotgun blast to the face" [http://k6ge.signourguestbook.com/?trail=3320]. > ...even though he is literally stalking people, admitting on the air he steals their personal information. "Literally stalking" here meaning, catching someone prowling about near and taking pictures of his personal residence for no legitimate purpose or following him personally under the guise of "t-hunting", following that person back to their residence and stumbling across information possibly identifying that individual - who may also be responsible for "following" him around to various amateur radio repeaters, subjecting him and his correspondents to malicious and intentional interference in violation of Part 97 rules [without identifying], not to mention a campaign of verbal harassment and defamation. Also, obtaining personal information the way he claimed he found it is not "stealing". > Doubling down on the puffery, KA6JMM makes excrable claims about "catching" a supposed spy... Again, HOW, exactly? He didn't just happen to trip over information that led him to your personal residence - to the extent this actually happened. And you were posting pictures of his residence on this website prior to this alleged event. Why were you - or anyone else, assuming anyone else actually did - visiting his residence? Other than to take pictures so that you could publish them online for no other purpose than harassment, I mean. Your behavior - if, as I suspect, this all played out the way I believe it did - served no purpose, and if you were caught and exposed... it may be a bit of a stretch to say, "you got what you deserved", because this whole personality conflict between the two of you is so incredibly stupid, but it's hard to have too much sympathy for you because, as the saying goes, play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Calling it "stalking" doesn't make it so. It's just more illustration of you being a coward who can't admit he's as much of a bad actor - or significantly worse than - as the person he's whining about. > I erroneously defend KA6JMM because I didn't hear him utter the information on that particular broadcast. Nothing like doubling down on wrong conclusions, eh? You offered what you offered; it's not my fault that what you offered didn't live up to its billing. If you'd have published some other recording that actually contained what you'd claimed the previous recording contained, the story would be different. That said, even if he had given out whatever phone number he obtained, while not the sort of thing I would do and not something I condone, you really have no room for complaint given that 1. he almost assuredly only found out who you were because you were prowling about his property for no good reason and 2. you yourself - or one of the one or two other DarkSleaze - did the same thing on this website on September 5, 2019 [http://k6ge.signourguestbook.com/?trail=880]. See, like a lot of hypocrite hams - or, in your case, hypocrite bootleggers - you don't have a problem with the actual behavior, only that it was you who was the "victim" - for lack of a better word. Were the shoe on the other foot, as you seemingly have constantly attempted to make the case through your acts [in another fine illustration of hypocrisy], you'd feel different. > I barely contain my joy at KA6JMM's stalking and trash pilfering from other hams garbage bins, again ASSUMING it's all related to the owner of the recordings whom I am desperate to "defeat" on Flamebook. "Joy"? No, guy. There's no "joy" in this at all. This is all really REALLY stupid, and it makes amateur radio operators generally look bad. There's far too much of this kind of nonsense. While it's typically hilarious when it's all talk as it usually is on the repeaters in the 2-meter LA scene, when it escalates to the level you've taken it, it's way over the line. This was the sort of thing Roger meant when he had something resembling a proverbial soul and talked about his one rule was that you don't, "take it off the air". Of course we know Roger had vastly different standards for different people and that in most cases those who were falsely accused of "taking it off the air" - like JMM - didn't actually take anything off the air in any legitimate way. You really should be glad that nothing either of you has done has resulted in felony convictions like it did to one particular doofus down in GA who was a 14.313 "player". That failed abortion even got his wife involved, which resulted in her getting a less severe misdemeanor conviction - and legitimate bad press both on the internet and on the local news. To feel "joy" I'd have to have skin in the game, which I don't. I have no love for JMM at all, and I have no particular hate for you. As I said, you and I have played off of one another here at times and it's been funny. And I even authored a post detailing why you were absolutely right about JMM's stupid claim that his amateur radio transmissions are "copyrighted". That said, your behavior is a little bit disturbing, as is much of what you've published to this website. You seem to think that it's somehow reasonable and justifiable to accuse people of, among other criminal acts, molesting children and publish pictures of their families and their private property to no legitimate end because at some point very likely long in the past JMM hurt either your feelings or the feelings of someone you're here white-knighting for and/or because you irrationally blame consequences either you or someone you're here white-knighting for has suffered as a result of your stupid behavior and peculiar fixation on JMM. Honestly, all that separates you from the dunce in GA is that you seem to be a half step higher on the ladder of articulateness and a half step lower on the ladder of impulsiveness. > The posts on Flamebook that so thoroughly incense me are only provided for KA6JMM's responses. Which has to be inconvenient for you as he, seemingly, doesn't comment here. > I should not give in to the voices telling me to scrutinize the posts exactly as American Communists insist on fact-checking President Trump. Now that's just below the belt... when PDJT is "scrutinized", it's rarely with a view toward establishing the truth of a matter. I would think that at the very least you'd realize that far from simply being put out here to tear you down, I'd merely like to know what is driving you to behave in a way that, seen in the light most favorable to you, is extremely silly. Plus, and I'm not ashamed to admit it, I enjoy amateur radio hi-jinks and tomfoolery, and if you can help me find a heretofore untapped source of it, I'm all in. I'd ask you, what's your endgame? What is the goal you're trying to reach? > I need to realize that my attacks benefit JMM's detractors and serve to keep KA6JMM's callsign present on hundreds of pages of Flamebook. A huge overstatement, but I understand why you feel you have to frame your "reality" thus. > I've also failed to accept zero readers on Flamebook are cheering on my douche-knighting for KA6JMM in dozens of posts every day for several weeks now. It's actually closer to not even a dozen over the past forty or so days since you and I first started exchanging messages on the topic. You and I seem to be the only real "show" here at the moment, and the one or two DarkSleaze hanging around - to the extent those aren't more of your sockpuppets, which while not definitive is highly likely - aren't really adding anything to it. And whatever anyone else things of my comments on this topic is irrelevant. If they have something to add, great! If they don't find my comments of value, what of it? In the end, only you really care. I'm just trying to spur on some decent conversation. > I am quite giddy to announce the ever-expansive journey down my innermost sewer hole of illogic will continue to clog Flamebook for weeks to come. Well, if you're not interested in conversing in the spirit in which my remarks were offered - that is to say to give you a chance to discuss your issues with JMM in a reasonable way rather than the way you've conducted yourself from early 2018 through today and in earlier years of the Flamebook [late 2016 until early 2018 was complete shit... mostly just ASCII dick pics and that nonsense you attributed (wrongly) to me about clickbait, "YDO keep on sucking" and ridiculous "Stitch" comments], I don't intend to offer reasoned, fact-based rebuttals to your comments too much going forward. But with what regard to what you've offered previously - and continue to in your responses to me - "sewer hole of illogic" is a fine way of putting it given that you state that your comments are meant for a person who seemingly isn't commenting here. A comment about an old man yelling at a cloud seems appropriate, no?
Comments: Jack Hill is a cunt Stop calling him sexy - unless you find pieces of shit attractive.
Comments: Ham Sandwich is not Hammy Sammy. Ham Sandwich always posted quick and to the point unlike Hammy Spammy. The lengthy posts go unread eventually.
Comments: There's almost 107,000 hams in California (ARRL number) yet only KA6JMM gets permanently banned from numerous Southern California repeaters. Document one other ham AND the repeaters (at least 5) he or she has been banned from. Glad that barely walking douchebag is banned from 450!
Comments: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-HGr0qPGzNRU/T3txEZlprGI/AAAAAAAAAXo/GZTAep60Tjk/s1600/negrofatigueflyer.jpg
Comments: Break for seXXXy Jack Hill!! I'm bringin seXXXy back... His name is seXXXy Jack... https://i.imgur.com/Eo6y9IP.png
Comments: There I go, hastily promoting incorrect conclusions. I get so vexatious that I start mixing in my other "H.S." alter-egos (Ham Sandwich) and commingle my hyperbolic methods of attack. Sorry readers of Flamebook! Invoking "butthurt" is assuredly a telling projection of my current mental state. I desperately wish to be the Flamebook White Knight for KA6JMM yet I am quite the resounding failure. As a Flamebook wag pointed out, I do not cope well with unemployment. What I previously typed in obfuscating "gotchya" haste: "....extraordinarily butthurt that he was caught during one of his stalking excursions to JMM's property and followed back to his own property where JMM allegedly obtained personal information your friend ignorantly discarded" Let me unpack that illustrative mashup of "fawlty" logic and hysterical projections: You see, I raptly listened to one recording of KA6JMM and conflated it in with another. Piously emulating a squawking Social Justice Warrior I immediately went on the attack. I've never considered that the _mere existence_ of the recordings incommodes KA6JMM no end, triggering rage fueled broadcasts on W6CDW. Just one of the many reasons Cliff Wallace banned KAJMM. Why might anyone share recordings of KA6JMM's brain-belches if such clues would lead JMM back to them? Yet I, Hammy Sammy have already concluded JMM caught the owner of the recordings. I've previously defended JMM's broadcasted threats as innocent and unadulterated puffery even though he is literally stalking people, admitting on the air he steals their personal information. Doubling down on the puffery, KA6JMM makes excrable claims about "catching" a supposed spy so I foolishly run with it much the same as liberals embracing Christine Blasey Ford's liberal wet dreams. I erroneously defend KA6JMM because I didn't hear him utter the information on that particular broadcast. Nothing like doubling down on wrong conclusions, eh? Building upon my house of blank cards I barely contain my joy at KA6JMM's stalking and trash pilfering from other hams garbage bins, again ASSUMING it's all related to the owner of the recordings whom I am desperate to "defeat" on Flamebook. It's utterly convenient to claim such things when you have no evidence. Pretty much what I attack others for. What I should have learned but haven't: The posts on Flamebook that so thoroughly incense me are only provided for KA6JMM's responses. I should not give in to the voices telling me to scrutinize the posts exactly as American Communists insist on fact-checking President Trump. I need to realize that my attacks benefit JMM's detractors and serve to keep KA6JMM's callsign present on hundreds of pages of Flamebook. I've also failed to accept zero readers on Flamebook are cheering on my douche-knighting for KA6JMM in dozens of posts every day for several weeks now. (I'll have to post support for myself in my next tome) I am quite giddy to announce the ever-expansive journey down my innermost sewer hole of illogic will continue to clog Flamebook for weeks to come. Hammy Sandwichy, er Hammy Sammy
Comments: Hammy Sammy doesn't own Flamebook. Anyone can post anything the Admin allows.
Comments: In reply to "disappointed" who said: > Well, I am Disappointed. "Hammy Sammy" isn't Smarter Than A 5 Year Old. My daughter learned how to identify image sources at 5 yrs old. Actually, I already knew where or the Internet three of the six images to which my previous remarks referred were hosted. If you weren't already aware of it, two came from Zillow, one from JMM's Facebook page and the others from two different image-hosting websites. That said, my use of the word "source" did not refer to where on the Internet they were hosted, which is irrelevant. My use of the word "source" referred to the person who took in particular the three pictures that were posted to image-hosting websites and the circumstances [time, date, etc] of them taking the pictures. Had you read in particular numerical point 4 in that post, you'd probably have understood why that's something of an important point - particularly where it concerns the picture that was taken and published here prior to June of 2019. Do tell, are you of similar mindset to the obvious mental defective who typically spams this site with comments using JMM's full call-sign and either the term "SnitchBoy" or "Dark Fleas" [sleaze, is actually much more appropriate, yes?] who seems to be extraordinarily butthurt that he was caught during one of his stalking excursions to JMM's property and followed back to his own property where JMM allegedly obtained personal information your friend ignorantly discarded, but, in his total lack of self-awareness and blatant hypocrisy thinks it's justifiable and completely normal to prowl about around someone else's property, take pictures and publish them to the internet and encourage others to harass that person because they hurt your feelings over ham radio years ago? I hold out hope that you're more capable of conversing in a reasonable manner with a view toward establishing the truth of matters than the dishonest, defaming, sick-minded, hypocrite, reprobate spammer.
Comments: It appears Hammy Sammy is cracking from sheltering at home and being unemployed. The long-winded posts by Hammy Sammy prove he has too much time on his hands and unable to manage it.
Comments: Well, I am Disappointed. "Hammy Sammy" isn't Smarter Than A 5 Year Old. My daughter learned how to identify image sources at 5 yrs old. The little darling made some amazing web posts without ever hosting her own images. Gonna' buy her a Baofeng and get her on the air with a tech license ASAP.
Comments: Oi vey... lots more projection, but precious little else from the too-many-names-to-count, million+ words, thousands+ post Flamebook spammer, admitted jammer and coward who doesn't ID - probably doesn't have a license - and defamer who thinks it's somehow justifiable to accuse people of molesting children - not to mention other less severe criminal acts - because of hurt feelings from many years in the past over the relatively unimportant amateur radio hobby. Just to clarify a few minor points... I actually discovered my first remarks here, which were right after the Henry "bowl-cut" picture in early 2018. What's really funny is that you and I have played off of each other several times, both making fun of Buzz AND criticizing JMM for his "copyright" claims. Obviously hypocrisy is your middle name, so it's not surprising to see you try to make a thing of me making fun of Snickers Boi the same way you have. Of more immediate concern would be the seeming anger in your projection regarding homosexuality, given your transphobic "Ms Ricky" campaign of late 2018 through 2019 and some of your more sexually dysfunctional, homophobic comments about him and what you imagine he's doing with various "half dead, drug addled" hams from CDW. You've got some very negative personality and character flaws and, I suspect, some mental health issues - not the least of which may be obsessive personality disorder, manifesting in your peculiar obsession with JMM. You've made several comments that are indicative of having run into real-life problems stemming from your irrational obsession; a mentally healthy individual would not have become so obsessed to begin with, but would certainly have changed direction after encountering the sort of issues you purport to have dealt with. That you've seemingly only become more dedicated to your irrational obsession doesn't bode well. I say in all seriousness that you probably should give serious thought to seeking out the services of a mental health professional. |
| < Previous 20 | Next 20 > |
Back to THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK!