Comments: Is that as big as Richard Clark can get his penis to grow!
Comments: http://41.media.tumblr.com/0a17a302ffc1422aedfc6f498424c534/tumblr_o2vhd9UZft1um9hm5o1_500.jpg
Comments: Let me fake everyone by pasting Richard Clark's name on my obnoxious posts. You see i am a chicken-shit and do not want people to discover who i am. I do this because i do not have the balls to take responsibility for my words. I have no respect for me so why should you and if you knew who i was you would make fun of me and in my delicate state i do not know if i could handle that kind of reality. The entire baine of my existence is to not be ignored. I have nothing to really offer in the form of an intelligent conversation or opinion on any subject so the only other way for me to not be overlooked and ignored is by being a disruptive and obnoxious ASS-HOLE. Hang on - i hear people engaged in a really interesting conversation of the repeater right now - i got to interrupt them by playing over and over again some disruptive long-winded AM talk show over the top of them to keep them from making their points. OK - they gave up, where was i. Oh ya time to post a large penis out here or maybe post a bunch of back to back blind links of naked little boys again. God i hope i do not get discovered again, last time my mother nearly kicked me out of her house and at over 40 years old what ever would i do then.
Comments: my new tech startup company has some very high profile customers. we are going to be millionaires on website templates and hosting. Do it with RECIFY.COM examples: http://www.recify.com/page/recify-website-portfolio/1/ Roger bly Owner, Founder, CEO, CFO, President, Partner, Investor, Legal Council, Helpdesk Support, Majority Stockholder. RECIFY.COM
Comments: Fast talk disclaimer = dishonest On My Planet, Fast Talking Radio Ad Disclaimers Would Be Illegal Radio is a popular medium for advertisers, such as mortgage companies, to promote special offers. But the last few seconds are sometimes filled with unintelligible, fast-talking disclaimers. I get it. It's the law that disclaimers are needed. But when they are unintelligible, what's the point? And who gets hurt? The consumer. Take a look at this humorous example at just how silly these ads end up. Now in case you didn't figure it out, these advertisers do not actually hire fast talking humans to handle the disclaimer (back in the pre-digital days they did). Rather, it is handled digitally. They simply remove all the dead air between words and apply other enhancements to squeeze all that legal mumbo jumbo into just a few seconds. On my planet, legislation would be more business friendly and provide a means for consumers to obtain the legal mumbo jumbo in a clearly written, or spoken fashion. This could be done via phone number, email or website. The end of the commercial could say "to get the fine print of this offer call..." or "text mortgagead to 5556" or "visit our fine print page online at www...." Advertisers would then be in a position to provide a much more valuable "fine print" experience for their customers and prospects and not look and sound so silly trying to comply with laws and lawyer opinions which result in so much language being squeezed in at the end of an ad. The same can be said for television disclaimers. Ever notice how the fine print is microscopic at the end of a commercial? There's 5, 10, 15 lines of text. You can't read it. It's there because it's the law. But it adds no value to the ad if it can't be read. And it makes the advertiser look dishonest. Good intentioned consumer-friendly legislation is being designed and implemented poorly. On my planet it will be better for consumers. It's a win-win because it doesn't disrupt the legislation, just the delivery channels of it. It will be better for advertisers who can still comply in more practical ways. The lawyers still get their slice of the pie writing these legal statements. The politicians still get the feather in their cap for passing consumer friendly laws. And the advertisers still get to be creative with their ads, get more creative value per second from their ads and provide a more customer friendly means of delivering the mandated fine print regarding their products and services.
Comments: https://truthkings.com/report-dpw-admits-severe-california-storms-result-geoengineering/#
Comments: http://youtu.be/rHXNWVI-SWY
Comments: You know it is the Scrappers flooding this group with their queers pictures. Ban those idiots off here, let them be queers on their own Flamebook.
Comments: Just keep on flooding this forum with your obvious infatuation with young naked boys. Post after post just proves that you spend way too much of your time on these sites carefully picking and chose exactly the correct on for the flamebook. Eventually the SYSOP of this forum will have no choose but to limit all of our access to post out here hust because you are a selfish ass-hole. Good Job
Comments: So revolting do many Republicans find the prospect of having Donald Trump as their nominee that three in 10 say they would not vote for him in November, and some are now speaking openly about leaving the GOP for a third party. An exodus like that could wreck the GOP. But it might be wrecked already. And at least those leaving could look themselves in the mirror — rather than looking like, say, a horrified Chris Christie, who appeared behind Trump on Super Tuesday resembling Oedipus at the moment he realized what he had done. But what sort of party would appeal to the GOP’s anti-Trump forces? The answer seems obvious: a party that embodies the opposite of Trump. On the issues, that would mean: A party that does not merely welcome immigration, but celebrates it. A party that treats individuals as individuals , not as indistinguishable sub-units of larger racial, ethnic, or other cohorts (Jews, Muslims, “The Mexicans,” etc.). A party that is therefore not “fine” with either bigotry or affirmative action, as Trump is. A party that, unlike Trump, consistently supports the First Amendment. And the Second. A party that would never endorse a record-shattering $5.7 trillion-with-a-T tax hike — which Trump not only endorsed, but proposed. A party that, unlike Trump, doesn’t think it’s a good idea to go around killing the family members of suspected terrorists. Or torturing people, either. A party that believes in free trade, not 45 percent tariffs on countries that supply goods American consumers want. A party that steadfastly opposes forcing people to buy things they don’t want, such as health insurance. A party that finds eminent-domain abhorrent, not a ”wonderful” club to bash little old ladies with. A party that, unlike Trump, supports equal rights for the LGBT community. A party that, unlike Trump, opposed government bailouts for the auto companies. And Wall Street. And handouts to nonprofit groups such as Planned Parenthood, too . It would take a lot of work to launch a third party like that, especially in time for the November election. Fortunately for disaffected Republicans, they don’t have to. There already is one: the Libertarian Party. DONT WISH FOR WHAT YOU WANT VOTE FOR WHAT YOU DESERVE
Comments: http://truthinmedia.com/libertarian-party-registrations-rising/ Garyjohnson2016.com http://youtu.be/toaFfZ1S7UQ Its not about being "right" or "wrong" Its about a nation where the rule of law is absolute Where the constitution limits govt Not you REJECT ALL DIVIDE AND CONQUER EMBRACE ALL RACES IF THEY EMBRACE FREEDOM BLACK AND WHITE TOGETHER IS THE ONLY WAY http://youtu.be/gRSgUTWffMQ Malcolm was trying to warn all races... What a society allows to happen to its minority... Will happen to the majority Tyranny doesnt take a break Semper vigilans
Comments: Sam why don't you go tech assist the 449.500 repeater as it keeps generating static noise. You know those idiots do not have any technical talent to fix it. 435 most likely will need to bail those retards out again.
Comments: In those CuddymySack photos below which Scrapper do you think is the Top and which is the bottom? Any guesses?
Comments: Dirty pictures of Jehovah's Witnesses, in harmony. http://tinyurl.com/gojwp4l They got rid of the Nigger because he had his dick and looking at the little child! Before and after look!
Comments: Say no to child molesters! https://youtu.be/ghE4eKg8AV4
Comments: Those pictures look like the Scrappers were having a little fun. You know dicks in the ass type of thing.
Comments: http://content.wafflegirl.com/galleries/content/1/624/1624336_fb8ed85.jpg
Comments: http://content.wafflegirl.com/galleries/content/1/624/1624333_b264918.jpg
Comments: http://www.posingguys.com/567/images/11.jpg
Comments: http://www.posingboys.com/porn/312/images/14.jpg |
| < Previous 20 | Next 20 > |