Comments: Hammy Sammy, Thank you for (indirectly) verifying what we have suspected. Our advice is that you dive deeper into what your "source" has presented to you as facts about some of the topics we've touched upon here. All lies lead to the truth. Best regards, The other "Hammy Sammy" & Friends
Comments: I've noticed that the Faux Hammy Sammy doesn't pay any attention to the Original Anonymous SJW Hammy Sammy (OASJWHS). Just triggers OASJWHS' predictable rages and laughs at the spectacle....
Comments: Good grief the "Snitchboy" Spammer has been busy this AM... And wow, your list of nonsense is repetitive. Let's delve into some of these ridiculous whining points: "I thought I would share my tiresome and repetitive "Twenty Internet Debate Techniques For Defending KA6JMM" which I am sure of everyone on Flamebooke being so tired of:" I'm not sure how many people who use the FB actually care about this little back-and-forth between us, but if the alternative is your lame edited pictures of JMM with the homophobic commentary and obsession with gay sex acts or the disgusting pictures of obese bellies, I suspect they'll go with my comments - of which there has only been one this AM, despite your spam-posting with my name. "1. It has to be a HUGE post!" As I've said before, it should be of sufficient length to respond to the "argument" - to the extent your spam constitutes a legitimate argument - and to sufficiently hit all the relevant points. And, of course, I use the word "relevant" loosely so far as it concerns your remarks. "2. The post must total at least three screaming-for-attention screen scrolls and thousands of words." This from a person who has, over the past five years, spam-posted so great a volume of nonsense to this site that one can go pages seeing your own comments. Interestingly, but for maybe four comments on this page, and maybe one or two from others, this whole page and most of the last two are all your garbage. Oh, and perhaps one or two of the dark sleaze. "I love to parse and quote a few words entirely out of context" For instance? "It needs to be twice as long as those Ascii Dick Pics I used to post all the time." I have no concrete proof you - the "Snitchboi" Spammer - were the ASCII spammer from a couple of years back, though it wouldn't surprise me. "3. Deny, deny, deny! I get caught red handed but like any 3 year old I just deny over and over." I'm not sure exactly what you've caught me "red handed" doing. At least, in so far as you've actually proven anything you've claimed. It bears repeating that the only time you've ever made an attempt to prove something you've claimed - when you posted a few mundane audio clips at my request - they didn't come within an astronomical unit of proving any of your tall tales about JMM. "4. Defend KA6JMM in the most suspicious and vigorous way possible" I'm not sure there's anything "suspicious" about me asking for proof that he's engaged in any misdeeds you've accused him of - and you've failed spectacularly to prove even your silliest claims about him, such as that it's a demonstrable fact that he was responsible for "jamming" SPARC on the various occasions you've claimed that he was. "...yet at the same time I claim I don't know him and I don't live in the area, LOL!" I've been pretty clear in that I "know" him the exact same way you do - by reputation, and as a voice on the radio. I've never met him and I've never been in the same room as him. I wonder if he and I have ever actually been in the same State, though I suppose anything is possible. Also, the extent to which he and I "know" each other is entirely irrelevant as far as it concerns YOUR demonstrably false and unproven claims about him. "Talk about a creepy obsession!" Well, to my credit I've merely authored a handful of comments asking why it is that he lives rent free in your head - as he clearly does. People can label things as they will, but how that's "creepy" compared to a person who, among other things, travels who knows how far on numerous occasion to photograph another person's property and post pictures of it on the web along with numerous unsubstantiated if not demonstrably false allegations of criminal acts, I'm sure I don't know. The only reasonable explanation is that mentally defective people - such as yourself - rarely acknowledge their own defects, and often engage in the same sort of finger-pointing you do in an attempt to talk around their poor behavior. "People might think we are cyber lovers if I'm not careful." Careful, your displays of sexual dysfunction are becoming legion - much more than your dark sleaze. "5. I know KA6JMM SO WELL (but deny I know him in the same breath)" This sort of obfuscation borders on ridiculous. "...that I can declare he does not need to use this website but he is all over "social media"." You insist on claiming that he's using his website, going so far as to state which screen names he's using. I've yet to see a shred of proof from you that he's using any of those names, and plenty which indicates not only is he not the author of posts from those names, but that those posts are coming from you - the same way you're using "Hammy Sammy" and "Model Ham" to post comments. "6. Every Flamebook message from KA6JMM attacking BB & SPARC just can't be JMM so accuse someone else of authoring them." Please provide substantive proof that JMM is the author of any posts to this website. [That you say so doesn't constitute substantive proof]. "7. KA6JMM is well known for harassment and defamation of other hams..." Then you should have no problem illustrating that with some sort of concrete, unimpeachable evidence. Who, specifically, has he "harassed"? "Defamed"? What actions can you prove he's engaged in that cross the line of typical amateur radio back-and-forth into "harassment", and where are the charges and convictions for this behavior? What statements has he made that constitute "defamation"? Where were these statements recorded? Who has he made these statements against? As defamation has a clear legal definition, it would bolster your case to illustrate where he's been taken to court and found liable for such behavior. Please provide evidence. "...but declare any mocking of JMM as "cowardly"." I don't know about "any". Yours generally is. "Because I claim I don't live in SoCal how would I know his history anyhow?" You've heard the phrase, "He [or she] who asserts must prove". You're the person making claims that another party has engaged in criminal acts - including serious criminal acts like child molestation, not me. "Oh right, invoke the-"not on the Internet"-claim-makes-it-invalid even though the Internet does not truly encompass the sum of human experience and knowledge." I've never suggested that what you've alleged - with no proof whatsoever - couldn't be true simply because evidence of such can't be found on the internet. Go back to our earliest exchange; you'll find I said pretty much the exact opposite of that. The TRUE state of affairs is that you've provided NO PROOF WHATSOEVER of anything you've alleged against this man. That's saying nothing of how when you actually took the time to offer what in your mentally diseased mind was "proof" - a few meager, mundane sound clips - of your many and serious allegations, said "proof" didn't prove what you alleged. Not only that, when asked for proof, you not only take it as a personal insult, but you go out of your way to personally attack the person who dares you to ask. "8. Never offer any proof but DEMAND it at every turn, because, well, that is my right." What exactly do you want me to offer proof of? That JMM isn't here? That's pretty obvious. You're the one insisting that he is, yet you've failed to prove it. You're the one insisting he's engaged in some huge amount of, "harassment" [do you even know the legal definition of the word?], yet can't even bother to state who specifically he's "harassed" or what he said/did that constitutes "harassment". And no, legally, bloviating about how a certain person likes a certain restaurant isn't, "harassment". "9. Deflect by claiming I don't deflect, LOL!" That's two "LOLs" so far for you; we'll come back to that near the end. Anyone who isn't mentally defective can clearly see that not only am I not deflecting, I'm going to great lengths to respond to each and every point you try to make, no matter how irrelevant. "10. Create giant ridiculous posts..." Like the one I'm responding to? I understand it makes the post bigger, but about half of the post is me quoting you so that it can't be legitimately said that I'm ignoring or deflecting. "...but accuse others of not using Proof & Logic. I mean, answering sentence-by-sentence is logical and not obsessively anal, right?" Actually, answering line-by-line is entirely logical. Whatever else you might want to say, I'm showing you at least enough respect to answer you completely. You might try doing the same. But of course, you imagine yourself to be some superior sort of life-form, and too good for the usual pleasantries. After all, you imagine people you're harassing and defaming have some how done you wrong because they don't simply roll over and take it. JMM is a lesser being too, right? HOW DARE HE object to being followed from repeater to repeater and jammed with homophobic nonsense by an unidentified whisperer, right? And, honestly, HOW DARE HE have a problem with a creep on the internet following him around, taking pictures of his house, posting them on the internet and calling him a child molester, right? He's such a lesser life-form, he exists to be mistreated by superior beings like you in such ways, right? /sarc on all that, since I'm sure you didn't get it. "11. In the most ludicrous manner possible accuse others of not having a ham license, with no basis in fact" Right, clips of you doing it that you posted is, "no basis in fact". Oh, and where have you posted using your call? I must have missed it. I didn't miss you posting using OG's call, or JMMs. "...yet never ever offer up evidence of my own "call sign"." I'm under no obligation to publish my own letters. We're not on the air, I'm not pretending to be people I'm not and I'm not on tape jamming without benefit of call. "12. Use a tenet of my favorite book Mein Kampf..." It's interesting that you throw out appeals to emotion like that when the only person who attempted to throw out the word, "jewish" as an insult was you. "...repeat a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously"" Whatever else your lies about JMM et al may be, "colossal" is hardly the word I'd use. Well, at least they're not colossal to anyone else. You, personally, seem to allow him to occupy a colossal amount of real estate in your own mind. "13. When anyone copies my technique I will label it as lame appropriation and unrepentant lying." It's a demonstrable fact that you've lied; it's been pointed out and well illustrated, and bears no immediate rehashing. That's saying nothing of the claims you've made that are simply unsubstantiated - as well as unable to be substantiated. Yet you repeat them so often and with such fervor, and are so vehement in your personal attacks against those that dare question you, that you've elevated your mere unsubstantiated claims to gross falsehoods by yourself. "14. Keep trolling for information..." Ah, so we come to the heart of the matter; you really don't want anyone to know who you are. You're deathly afraid of it for some reason. Among other things that speaks to you not being a licensed amateur radio operator because they generally don't care if people know who they are. But that's a minor point. You've got some sort of secret that you just can't allow anyone to know, and whatever that secret is - it's very likely something no one would care about if they knew it, but it's REALLY important to you [another illustration of your overblown sense of self] - it's tightly wrapped up in this ridiculous vendetta. And you know that you can't prove ANYTHING you've said about JMM without giving up something that will expose you. Nevermind that JMM allegedly knows who you are, or so you've hinted at heavily, if not claimed outright. Is part of this whole nonsensical Flamebook-only grudge that he knows who you are, and doesn't consider you worthy of responding to even on this website few people take seriously? If so, I'm sure that's a huge blow to that ego. "...throw out the same baseless accusations in every sentence: no license, no privileges, jamming various amateur radio repeaters without IDing, etc." There's nothing baseless in any of those allegations, and the one about you jamming while not IDing is supported by audio you posted! "In one breath say someone doesn't have a license and in the next infer it must be a lesser license while hoping for a corrective response." So you're saying you're a licensed amateur radio operator of at least General Class? If so, you're using a lot of words to tell me that you're not interested in having a voice QSO to talk about your many and serious allegations about JMM because doing so would expose your identity as you'd have to ID on 20 to talk to me. "15. Repeatedly accuse others of "projecting" because, well, much like a cross-dressing Ham Radio Mary Poppins I am practically perfect in every way." The only cross-dresser in amateur radio that I'm aware of is Roger Blight, whom you defend constantly despite how poor of a steward he's been of 435 and how much of a dishonest, hypocritical individual he is. I suppose you see a kindred spirit in those traits. I wonder, are you kindred spirits in the cross dressing as well? "16. Repetitively invoke "libel"..." Right... because that's what it is when you falsely accuse people of child molestation. "...yet falsely accuse others of all sorts of heinous crimes without any proof." Do tell: what "heinous" crime have I "falsely" accused anyone of? "17. Yet again, invoke gross defamation..." See response to item 16. "...when I accuse others of jamming without a license..." Yet again, it bears repeating that you posted audio clips of yourself - wait for it - jamming without IDing your station. You also fail to discern that not only is it not "gross defamation" [it's not even defamation, seeing as how it's true] to state that a person is jamming without IDing when they posted audio of themselves jamming without IDing, there's a galaxy of difference between saying that someone is an unidentified jammer [even if it's not true which, in this case, it is] and accusing someone of molesting children. If you don't understand that very basic thing, you're even more of a mentally defective person than you've shown yourself to be with your ridiculous responses to me. "18. Spend hours and hours posting these giant screen wasters..." Heh... okay. One more time for those who haven't gotten it yet: five years+ and literally hundreds [if not thousands] of posts of either demonstrably false or unsubstantiated claims about JMM, many of them making claims of serious criminal activity with no basis in fact, posts commenting on following JMM around Wildomar and even out of state, claiming JMM has engaged in "stalking" [whatever that's supposed to mean to the claimant] while posting numerous pictures of his house and giving out all sorts of PI about him, countless GB of doctored image files mocking JMM for being overweight and homophobic commentary, countless allegations of "jamming" with not even an FCC warning letter, LRDF report or near field intercept to back up the claim or even amateur t-hunting data that might make your case vs... not even a couple of dozen posts of mine merely asking for the slightest shred of proof of any of it. "19. Be sure to liberally add "LOL" at the end of many sentences, LOL" Like you did three times in this bout of digital diarrhea?
Comments: Flamebook Admin, can you please "encourage" the absence of Hammy Sammy posts once again?
Comments: Do you notice that Perry ALWAYS refers to: - faggots - big black cock - sucking big black cock - other homosexual activities In psychology, that is known as projection. Perry, just admit that you’re gay and stop the charade. Hammy "Squeaky" Sammy
Comments: I (Hammy Sammy) didn't think it was possible for anyone to be more dishonest, or have less credibility than myself. Then, that ridiculous noose hoax occurred in NASCAR. Still, all of that pales in comparison to the dishonesty of me, the one and only Hammy Sammy, hateful-defaming-libelous spammer of Flamebook. That puts me (Hammy Sammy) in mind of something from antiquity... I've updated it for our times: FIRST I (Hammy Sammy) Wrote On Flamebook... First I (Hammy Sammy) wrote my lies about "Gobblecock" Richard Clark but other hams said nothing because they weren't Richard Clark Then I (Hammy Sammy) wrote my lies about Pat Sullivan but other hams said nothing because they weren't Pat Sullivan Next I (Hammy Sammy) wrote my lies about Roger Bly but other hams said nothing because they weren't Pat Sullivan Next I (Hammy Sammy) wrote my lies about Tommy Prager but other hams said nothing because they weren't Tommy Prager Next I (Hammy Sammy) wrote my lies about Chris Pulse but other hams said nothing because they weren't Chris Pulse Then they exposed my (Hammy Sammy) lies and hatred, but no one gives a shit about an anonymous hater like me, Hammy Sammy Stand against Hammy Sammy harassment! Stand against anonymous Hammy Sammy defamation! On-air silence is just silence without Hammy Sammy's jamming and Squeaky Voices. Ham lives don't matter to me while I (Hammy Sammy) spam my libel.
Comments: Does anyone read these rambling posts going back and forth between these obsessed verbal masterbators?
Comments: https://youtu.be/NnmwuiptvEU?t=241
Comments: Happy Battle of the Beaver Dams (War of 1812) to the love of my life. The beautiful N6UBY Tammi Prager 
Comments: Just when you thought 435 could not go any lower.. Purple nigger Max now on priority voip access to kill all shows and demonstrate his niggardness Pls explain the compelling reasons for nigger Max on voip? Oh yeah. He'll suck any horsecock or any cock Do you think Roger puts on the skirt for Max ?
Comments: Break for seXXXy Jack Hill!! I'm bringin seXXXy back... His name is seXXXy Jack...
Comments: "Gobblecock" Guy is a MODEL ham. God bless the "Gobblecock" Guy He is trying to red pill the nation Dear "Gobblecock" Guy,, Please keep id'ing as N6OGM. It drives that faggot crazy. Keep up the great work. Also if you need bail money when Roger Bly citizen arrests you..we'll be there to help. Kudos to you, Gobblecock/Sexaaay Jack Guy aka "Model Ham".
Comments: Do you notice that Perry ALWAYS refers to: - faggots - big black cock - sucking big black cock - other homosexual activities In psychology, that is known as projection. Perry, just admit that you’re gay and stop the charade. Squeaky
Comments: CAUTION BURBANK AIRPORT Be on the lookout for the absurd cross dressing communist Pat Sullivan at the Burbank Airport. His smelly suspicious cockroach ass has been seen casing some of the flat screen tv's. All of this looting has given Pat some "ideas". Pat knows that the tv's at the airport always have CNN on them. Pat feels if he can steal an airport tv.. he'll never have to pay for CNN again.
Comments: I think a dramatic reading of my updated version of FIRST THEY CAME in Mr. Gobblecock's voice would be incredible. If either he or the Squeaky contingent are viewing this website, if you could facilitate that, I think it could be a masterpiece DVR for the next decade.
Comments: This is me a fat fat 20 Meter Ham https://youtu.be/RpyLRsFAP7o
Comments: Speaking of that despicable race hoaxer in Chiraq... I didn't think it was possible for anyone to be more dishonest, or have less credibility. Then, that ridiculous noose hoax occurred in NASCAR. Still, all of that pales in comparison to the dishonesty of the "Snitchboy" Spammer. That puts me in mind of something from antiquity... I've updated it for our times: FIRST THEY CAME... First they came with their lies about David Hildebrand and I said nothing because I wasn't David Hildebrand. Then they came with their lies about Glenn Baxter and I said nothing because I wasn't Glenn Baxter. Then they came with their lies about Billy Crowell and I said nothing because I wasn't Billy Crowell. Then they came with their lies about John Jolly, Brandon Boyles, Christopher Jones & Rick Bebout; still, I said nothing because I wasn't those people either. Then they came with their lies about me, and there was no one left to speak out for me. Stand against ham harassment. Stand against anonymous defamation. On-air silence is violence. Ham lives matter.
Comments: As the assuredly one and only Hammy Sammy I thought I would share my tiresome and repetitive "Twenty Internet Debate Techniques For Defending KA6JMM" which I am sure of everyone on Flamebooke being so tired of: 1. It has to be a HUGE post! If I don't type a voluminous accusatory response to every part of every sentence I feel threatened that somebody somewhere will think I am not "winning" some super important cyber-argument. I must dominate Flamebook! 2. The post must total at least three screaming-for-attention screen scrolls and thousands of words. I love to parse and quote a few words entirely out of context and concoct very long and very goofy paragraphs in response. It needs to be twice as long as those Ascii Dick Pics I used to post all the time. 3. Deny, deny, deny! I get caught red handed but like any 3 year old I just deny over and over. 4. Defend KA6JMM in the most suspicious and vigorous way possible yet at the same time I claim I don't know him and I don't live in the area, LOL! Talk about a creepy obsession! People might think we are cyber lovers if I'm not careful. 5. I know KA6JMM SO WELL (but deny I know him in the same breath) that I can declare he does not need to use this website but he is all over "social media". 6. Every Flamebook message from KA6JMM attacking BB & SPARC just can't be JMM so accuse someone else of authoring them. 7. KA6JMM is well known for harassment and defamation of other hams but declare any mocking of JMM as "cowardly". Because I claim I don't live in SoCal how would I know his history anyhow? Oh right, invoke the-"not on the Internet"-claim-makes-it-invalid even though the Internet does not truly encompass the sum of human experience and knowledge. 8. Never offer any proof but DEMAND it at every turn, because, well, that is my right. 9. Deflect by claiming I don't deflect, LOL! 10. Create giant ridiculous posts but accuse others of not using Proof & Logic. I mean, answering sentence-by-sentence is logical and not obsessively anal, right? 11. In the most ludicrous manner possible accuse others of not having a ham license, with no basis in fact, yet never ever offer up evidence of my own "call sign". 12. Use a tenet of my favorite book Mein Kampf; repeat a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously" 13. When anyone copies my technique I will label it as lame appropriation and unrepentant lying. Multisyllable false accusations are somehow more effective in my head. 14. Keep trolling for information, throw out the same baseless accusations in every sentence: no license, no privileges, jamming various amateur radio repeaters without IDing, etc. In one breath say someone doesn't have a license and in the next infer it must be a lesser license while hoping for a corrective response. Lame to think it will work but keep trying! 15. Repeatedly accuse others of "projecting" because, well, much like a cross-dressing Ham Radio Mary Poppins I am practically perfect in every way. 16. Repetitively invoke "libel" yet falsely accuse others of all sorts of heinous crimes without any proof. 17. Yet again, invoke gross defamation when I accuse others of jamming without a license (here I am projecting evidence of how often I jam with no ID on 20/40/80 meters as well as local repeaters) 18. Spend hours and hours posting these giant screen wasters but accuse others of spending too much time without admitting I am a decrepit dinosaur when it comes to Internet techniques. 19. Be sure to liberally add "LOL" at the end of many sentences, LOL 20. Embody the the classic techniques of the unrepentant liar and freely accuse others of being liars. Feel free to use these Solid Gold Debate Techniques over and over and look like a cyber-winner too!
Comments: Hey BB.... did you hear my (unidentified) comment about Jussie Smollet on SPARC today? If you can't recognize my real voice by now... I'll just continue with using the computer lady voice..... Since my name keeps coming up on the SPARC repeater I am asking you all a favor. BB I lost a few more of my Baofengs, have you found any? I don't understand how I keep misplacing them and the siren button seems to get stuck.
Comments: I, Hammy Sammy might as well come out of the closet and declare openly how much I despise Blacks, Fat People, Jews, Radio Rambos and Faggots (Communist or not). If you hadn't picked that up from my numerous messages I'd just like to make it clear where I stand on the subject of these low-IQ layabouts who suck the country dry. Simple observation confirms the demonstrable and indisputable truth that these groups of Fecal-Americans are disgusting, unrepentant un-American aberrations and mostly racists too. 
If you're not interested in conversing in the spirit in which my remarks were offered - that is to say to give you a chance to discuss your own dislike of these groups in a reasonable way .... then I'll just return to posting numerous ASCII dick pics.
Hammy Sammy
|
| < Previous 20 | Next 20 > |