KD6CQS.com




THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK!

Send anonymous repeater donations with
BitCoin to 3JgMzZgwSriyx1asH6SMZf49Hvxhee9CbW

450 Sunday Night Trivia
With your host Sue KD6UVD
8PM Pacific

Listen to 147.450 LIVE:



Email 450Renegaderadio@gmail.com for repeater donations.
Email flamebook@gmx.com for Flamebook issues.




17,282 Entries
KC6UBP 
9 hours ago

Comments:
Hi 450,

I am a model citizen.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/04/jones-criminal-history/jones-criminal-history.pdf

Darin Jones
Janitor


Robo Bunny 
9 hours ago

Comments:
What I can add about KA6JMM is from direct, personal observation at the MVARC t-hunt/picnic a while back

A bunch of us were gathered at the park table looking at some micro transmitters and up walks JMM in a ridonkulous outfit patterned after the BSA's pedophile scoutmasters:

Khaki Boonie hat
Khaki military style shirt with shoulder straps (Really?? For Epaulettes?)
Khaki shorts, just above the knee
Freakin' Nazi-made two strap Birkenstock sandals in Birkibuc & cork

JMM was waving around his tiny cheap Chinese crap "spectrum analyzer" as if he was the Lord God Ham Of The Day. My kids complained that he smelled funny and they stayed out of arm's reach of him whenever he tried to get friendly like Joe Biden (who brags kids liked to rub his hairy legs)

Anybody doesn't like that description is free to go suck on an egg.

PS: Those recordings of him violating Part 97 are REAL. Nightime on W6CDR was when JMM held court with the 'tardBillies and Squeakies. MVARC club members never liked hearing his Part 97 violations and told Cliff the repeater owner about JMM's nocturnal naughtiness.


Stitch! 
12 hours ago

Comments:
Hammy Sammy is a moron. If he knew any better he would talk to K6GE.

Yeah K6GE. The same one this web page is named after, dumbshit. Gary lives in Huntington Beach and his phone number is easily found.

KA6JMM went after Gary's business and wrote a nasty, accusatory letter to OSHA. It ended up costing Gary his livelihood. Gary was one of the great owners of 147.435 and I wish he was back.

JMM is an asshole.


Hammy Sammy 
13 hours ago

Comments:
When mommy comes home she has to clean up the mess I made because I spend all day furiously typing my diatribes into Flamebook. After Mommy makes me dinner I play on Flamebook for hours until Mommy starts nagging me to go to bed. Nag-nag-nag. Sometimes she gives me a snack. Here is my latest video





Hammy Sammy 
16 hours ago

Comments:
Just a few tidbits to address from the latest lame attempt at diplomatic mirroring from the "Snitchboi" spammer who says:

"Why should I actually go on the SPARC repeater, identify with a legal call sign and ask people who have been wronged by JMM, even losing their jobs due to his meddling?"

Again, why should I disclose my identity or my credentials when you not only vehemently refuse to do the same, but maliciously smear me for not disclosing information I have no good reason to disclose?

You're the party making outlandish, outrageous, scurrilous and defamatory allegations about people, not me.

I, personally, don't care about your real identity, and I never have.

Further, I don't buy into the idea that you've attempted to float that engaging in substantive discussion on the matter would somehow reveal your true identity - which, it seems, you fear would expose you to some horrible reprisals from JMM.

That said, the fact that you hide your identity while making these scurrilous and defamatory allegations is indicative of a couple of things:

1. That you know that there is, at best, only a small kernel of truth in what you've alleged,

2. that you know that if your real identity is revealed you'd potentially open yourself up to well-deserved legal reprisals and,

3. that, deep down, you know that such is exactly what you deserve.

Further, just who allegedly has been "wronged" by JMM to the point of, "losing their jobs" due to his so-called "meddling"?

Name just ONE person, and provide tangible, verifiable proof that it was some underhanded act on JMM's part, as opposed to the consequences of their own bad behavior that resulted in their alleged job loss.

Just ONE.

Any suggestion that you can't do that without exposing your personal information is complete, 100% horse shit - and you know it.

"Instead I demand facts and when they are presented I shrilly declare they must be LIES!"

You've presented no "facts".

You've presented smears, unsubstantiated claims and outrageous nonsense.

You've presented doctored audio, or audio that contains entirely benign commentary that doesn't come within a light-year of being controversial and that might, at best, show a minor violation that's the equivalent of going five miles per hour over the speed limit.

In a fine illustration of your mental defectiveness, you don't seem to see the hypocrisy in whining about that alleged minor Part 97 violation while you yourself are guilty of interfering with him and numerous other operators on multiple repeaters over a much longer period of time by playing vulgar, homophobic recordings - while not IDing, which is a far worse violation than having a short conversation with a "squeaky".

"This...would force me to confront the unpleasant truth that even though there is more considerable facts already presented..."

Where?

Surely I missed them.

Maybe rather than spam-posting over two months of my comments just to make a mess on the current page, you could actually go back and look at your own vast history of decidedly false, unsubstantiated, defamatory allegations and show me these "considerable facts" you claim I haven't addressed.

"I anguish over every time my friend KA6JMM is even merely mentioned on Flamebook."

JMM is not my "friend". JMM is not even a casual acquaintance. I have no problem discussing any legitimate criticism you have about him - provided you can do so such that it amounts to something other than your typical name-calling, spamming, cut/paste/rearrange "mirroring" [which never makes sense because your own claims are so outlandish compared to mine and because, unlike you, I'm actually honest] and other ridiculousness.

"I pretend to be on a quest for “truth” and some other unspecified endgame..."

I am seeking TRUTH.

It's unfortunate you're not a source of TRUTH.

As far as my "endgame"... well, that's not really the right word since I'm only interested in knowing what, specifically, this person is alleged to have done that would result in this half-decade+ meltdown you've been having - which you allege is based on things that occurred two decades ago or longer.

You've alleged in the past that JMM has somehow caused someone - you, presumably - to have trouble with law enforcement, and now you're suggesting that he's engaged in some underhanded behavior that's resulted in people - you, presumably - losing their jobs. You've also alleged that JMM has committed vile criminal acts.

I'm merely seeking proof that would substantiate those allegations and asking you to explain in a rational way why this state of affairs exists.

[Of course I already know that JMM has not been so much as charged, let alone convicted, of a criminal act because it's easy to view Riverside County's publicly available database of criminal charges, where there is no listing under his name.]

You say I should go to SPARC and ask them, but the discussion is taking place HERE and YOU are the one making the allegations.

The people I've talked to from SPARC don't seem very interested
in anything going on here. In fact they kind of think that it's funny that I'd even pay attention to your digital diarrhea. Of note, based on my admittedly brief discussions with only one or two people that are part of that userbase, no one seems to have a clue who you are or who you might be. Again, it's not important, but - assuming they're not lying - any actual wrongdoing allegedly done by JMM that would result in harm to you doesn't seem to have registered with them, which is another indicator that, at best, anything JMM may have done to cause you hurt feelings was minor and that you have greatly embellished the effects of said wrongs.

"Oh, let me close with: PHX is a retard and he really ought to stop driving by KA6JMM's house on Walnut in Wildomar. (That's what JMM tells me!)"

I "know" PHX in the same way I know JMM - that is, as a voice on the radio. JMM has never told me anything about him.

As for the rest of your lies, I don't think they need be addressed.


Hammy Sammy 
17 hours ago

Comments:
Every day my Mommy wakes me up and makes me breakfast. Then she goes to work. While she is gone I type, type, type on Flamebook. I love typing on Flamebook.


435 observer 
17 hours ago

Comments:
Hammy Sammy is a Gobblecock


Hammy Sammy 
08/11

Comments:
Yet again, I, the Hammy Sammy spammer, in appropriating people’s’ names, call signs and online personas, fails to be even a tiny bit honest about either those I'm dishonestly reviling, let alone myself.

My latest ploy seems to be accusing others of spamming or lying to, which is absurd - mostly because there is little, if any, truth in anything offered by me about KA6JMM who is well known and proven by legitimate audio recordings to violate Part 97 rules over two years time.

The bigger issue with my expansively defective Flamebook posts is that I imagine that anyone who attempts to offer a counterpoint to my disgusting defamation or other spamming nonsense is somehow lying or defaming which is exactly what I do all day long.

I don't possess the actual ability to censor but I daily engage in defamation-spewing, spamming harassment of ANYONE who says something "bad" about my good friend Rick Bebout and in this manner I imagine that I can deflect, detract or misdirect any legitimate criticism of Rick Bebout and effectively censor through generating quite a bit of nauseous noise. As Rick well knows, all I desire is a carefully framed and very limited exchange of only what I alone determine to be "legitimate" information about KA6JMM who I try to dress up as what I have concocted as a phrase "harmless and obscure". Why should I actually go on the SPARC repeater, identify with a legal call sign and ask people who have been wronged by JMM, even losing their jobs due to his meddling? Obtaining such facts would disrupt my carefully manufactured narrative about KA6JMM being "harmless", "obscure" and "somewhat goofy". Instead I demand facts and when they are presented I shrilly declare they must be LIES!

My trick is that I speak no TRUTH on those subjects, which is why any recordings or other comments trigger me so greatly, as has been thoroughly exposed in my exorbitantly long exchanges or often more peculiar quick but somewhat addled “responses”. It’s also why I have nothing better to do with my time than repeat the same childish insults, nicknames and baseless accusations all jammed into long posts just to take up the whole page with a block of blabbering paragraphs and text.

I am truly a lying, spamming creep with no more desire to speak the TRUTH on any subject than I would desire to engage in legitimate conversation about KA6JMM. This is because doing so would force me to confront the unpleasant truth that even though there is more considerable facts already presented I have a real fear of using my real identity - which SHOULD already be known to the Flamebook audience but I always demand of others what I fail to provide.

Often I will dream up strangely tangential missives in an attempt to sound clever and educated. Take for example Roy Den Hollander and George Sodini: I have long admired their clever cruelty and get a little sexually aroused when re-reading stories about their despicable activities. Compared to anyone else posting on Flamebook I am even more convinced of my own moral superiority and the indisputable fact that I alone am beyond question and criticism which flies in the face of the unconscionable, unparalleled and intolerable butthurt I anguish over every time my friend KA6JMM is even merely mentioned on Flamebook. I pretend to be on a quest for “truth” and some other unspecified endgame which I contend is more righteous than any other individual has imagined theirs was.

We’ll likely not know the answers to these questions any sooner than I will EVER reveal my amateur radio callsign or real name although I frequently demand that others do so or be considered liars and illegal operators of the ham bands.

I'll never come to my senses at any point -even if it was for my own good. Oh, let me close with: PHX is a retard and he really ought to stop driving by KA6JMM's house on Walnut in Wildomar. (That's what JMM tells me!)


Hammy Sammy 
08/11

Comments:
Yet again, the “Snitchboi” spammer, in appropriating people’s’ names, call signs and online personas, fails to be even a tiny bit honest about either those he’s reviling or himself.

His latest ploy seems to be accusing me of trying to “suppress” his “truth”, which is absurd - mostly because there is little, if any, truth in anything offered by the so called “Dark Fleas”.

The bigger issue with this mentally defective individual is that he imagines that anyone who attempts to offer a counterpoint to his disgusting defamation or his other spamming nonsense is somehow trying to “suppress” his speech.

I have neither the ability nor desire to attempt to censor or silence even disgusting, defamation-spewing, spamming harassment artists like the “Snitchboi” spammer. As he knows, all I desire is an exchange of legitimate information about a subject of amateur radio interest and knowledge as to what so-called “trauma” this individual imagines he’s suffered that he would spend decades of his life obsessed with the entirely harmless and obscure KA6JMM.

His problem is that he speaks no TRUTH on those subjects, which is why my comments trigger him so greatly, as has been thoroughly exposed in our brief exchanges and in his ever more peculiar “responses”. It’s also why he has nothing better to do with his time than cut and paste over two months of comments of mine into long posts he spent who knows how long removing all the formatting from just to take up the whole page with a block of text.

The lying, spamming creep has no more desire to speak the TRUTH on any subject than he does to engage in legitimate conversation about his own myriad allegations. This is because doing so would force him to confront the unpleasant truth that even if there was more than a kernel of truth in anything he’s alleged in the more than five years he’s been trashing this site, he would have no fear whatsoever of providing substantive proof of his allegations and doing so using his real identity - which SHOULD already be known to the supposed audience of all his digital waste product.

Roy Den Hollander and George Sodini weren’t afraid to tell the world who they were and why SPECIFICALLY they did what the did; in point of fact those men went out of their way to attempt to justify their cruel acts in remarkable detail. Is the “Snitchboi” spammer not even more convinced of his own moral superiority and the “indisputable” “fact” that he is beyond question and criticism in the face of unconscionable, unparalleled and intolerable butthurt inflicted as much as twenty years ago than two nut jobs his words bear such a great resemblance to? Is his quest for “truth” and some other unspecified endgame not even more righteous than those individuals imagined theirs was?

We’ll likely not know the answers to these questions as long as this buffoon continues on his present course.

Hopefully he comes to his senses at some point - mostly for his own good.


Flamebook Fan 
08/11

Comments:
To The Dark Fleas,

I have followed every one of your posts about Richard Bebout and had thought I was the only person possessing negative opinions of him. Your posts are worthy of repetition but I believe you have a final message to unveil and it will bring it all together. The truth needs to be available and brought to the ham masses. You are those leaders. Be the heros for those without the courage or strength to be heard. Ignore Hammy Sammy's campaign to suppress the truth about KA6JMM.

Awaiting patiently

Flamebook Fan aka FF


Hammy Sammy 
08/11

Comments:

Oi vey, what a temper tantrum on my part, the KA6JMM defender...

What's the matter? Every time I see KA6JMM mentioned somewhere on Flamebook over the last few days, but fail to suppress the message with a 1,00 word response I go into a Francis-like rage.

About that time I get a (mental) visit from my personal demons - the ones that my mentally defective mind has invented as a way of ignoring my own inferiority, but which I attribute to hurt feelings my boy scouts leaders allegedly caused [decades ago].


K6BZT 
08/11

Comments:
 
will this trial actually start today? don't hold your breath.


KA6JMM - Rick Bebout 
08/10

Comments:
To all,

Although Hammy Sammy has been a long time friend (since the good old 435 days!) and I appreciate his efforts, I am publicly saying I want him to stop these rather embarrassing tirades. There was some early fun when we first collaborated on the messages but I have been busy lately and recently remarried. I did not monitor Flamebook and was unaware of the extent of H.S.'s efforts and just want it to stop no matter what anyone says about me. "Any attention is good attention" is what I have always said. I'm the type who will basically wait by the river to observe the bodies of my enemies float by (after someone else does them in for me).

My friends know what repeaters to find me on when I am in town but I have been trying to get back up to the Summer Palace at my father-in-laws place in Washington state for a second honeymoon. The first honeymoon was going to be Carlsbad Caverns but an alternate had to be arranged.

Rick


Flamebook Fan,  
08/10

Comments:
To Hammy Sammy,

I have read Part 1 and Part 2 repeatedly. Your posts are worthy of another read but I believe you have a Part 3 to unveil and it will bring it all together. Please reveal your deep, personal friendship with Richard Bebout. Allow us to better understand your campaign to protect your best friend and illuminate his better traits. The truth needs to be available and brought to the ham masses. You are that individual. Be the hero for those without the courage or strength to be heard.

Awaiting patiently

Flamebook Fan aka FF


Hammy Sammy 
08/10

Comments:
PHX is “The Black Cat” , most assuredly a bloviating retard.... AND he should stop stalking that goofy amateur radio operator JMM.


HOFFMAN ALLIANCE REQUEST 
08/10

Comments:
Dear steve

Please take care of that noob fuck james cry ohh cry

We have had enough of this mf er

Its like heath collins fucked ydo and they had a baby named james

Uso is doing his due diligence on this boring fuck.

HOFFMAN ALLIANCE

WE ARE LEGION



Hammy Sammy 
08/10

Comments:
Oi vey, what a temper tantrum on the part of the "Snitchboi" spammer...

What's the matter? Did you hear JMM somewhere on the air over the last few days, but fail to get a reaction with your typical malicious interference [with vulgar & homophobic tape-playing] while not IDing?

Or, was it a visit from your personal demons - the ones that your mentally defective mind has invented as a way of ignoring your own inferiority, but which you attribute to hurt feelings JMM allegedly caused [decades ago]?


The Black Cat 
08/10

Comments:
G@g! M0re 0f th@t Hammy Sammy v0mit.



C@n't the Admin put a ch@racter limit 0n th@t m0r0n???


Flamebook Fan 
08/10

Comments:
To Hammy Sammy,

I have read Part 1 and Part 2 repeatedly. Your posts are worthy of another read but I believe you have a Part 3 to unveil and it will bring it all together. The truth needs to be available and brought to the ham masses. You are that individual. Be the hero for those without the courage or strength to be heard.

Awaiting patiently

Flamebook Fan aka FF


Hammy Sammy 
08/09

Comments:
Part 2

I, Hammy "Snitchboy" Sammy the self-imposed Judge, Jury, Jailor, and Jesus of the "Brotherhood of Licensed Legal Amateur Radio Operators", Anonymous Boot-Licker and Defender of KA6JMM, Trollish Spammer of Flamebook, generating a massively hypocritical harassment manifesto of Endless Undeserved or Excessive Criticisms with despicable commentary viciously bullying mocking and defaming LEGALLY licensed amateur radio operators (UZS,LYI, RJI, YDO etc.), Operating Wholly without offering a single shred of authoritative evidence, photographs, documents, links, or audio recordings let alone he's incapable of or unwilling to provide any evidence of his own possession of a valid Amateur Radio License but instead Hammy "SnitchBoy" Sammy endlessly repeats, retypes and regurgitates/reformats limitless mentally defective opinions, baseless accusations, shrill lies, relentless whining and petty half-truths as well as repetitively demanding documentation, evidence and other "proof" which he never, ever provides (notice that?) outside of asserting laughable "discussions with people in the know" without ever offering a statement that was attributed to a specific individual (nor will he respond to requests to do so) but instead doubles down on the childish validity of his own spam-like, generic, repetitive, unattributed, anecdotal claims while being incapable of offering a cogent explanation for his obsession with being the sole voice on Flamebook on all matters pertaining to KA6JMM who after five bans is no longer a welcomed individual in the brotherhood of licensed, legal amateur radio operators confining their activities to the guidelines, rules, FCC code and generally accepted behavior within the Amateur's Code.

That's me, Hammy "SnitchBoy" Sammy in a nutshell ('cause I’m a delusional nut exhibiting exceedingly peculiar behavior via Flamebook) Here is all of my ridiculously and overly wordy spam defending the FCC Rules violating KA6JMM from just a couple a days of my recent posts– (not including what I spam under all of the other pseudonyms full of imgur images) Now you have to read my effluvia all over again…


In reply to "SPARC Superiors" who said:"KA6JMM was banned outright after acting like a douche towards BB, next demanding an apology and then threatening BB. If you had any balls you would key up on SPARC and ask any of us, 'Hammy Sammy'."If by "acting like a douche" you mean he didn't just stand idly by and let someone blame him for the bad acts of others, then sure he was a "douche" to BB. Because, you know, it's kosher to blame a woman - rather than her rapist - for dressing "provocatively" when she gets raped, right?Again, I have it on good authority that this has actually all been worked out between the parties. Your unsubstantiated, hearsay comments mean nothing; audio or take a walk.I think I finally get what the "Hammy Sammy" spammer is going for... He's the next Roy Den Hollander or George Sodini, and the Flamebook is the venue for his "manifesto".What’s really funny is that it took the Hammy Sammy spammer longer to compile and dump all those links into one of his spam posts than it took me to write every comment of mine on the last two pages.I've had more discussions with people "in the know" who clarified that JMM was _extremely_ angry with BB for banning him from SPARC and that JMM has spent the last year plus calling BB a sociopath, and has even cryptically keyed up on SPARC without ID'ing and said "All he has to do is apologize". Based on these trustworthy members of SPARC's feedback and positive ID of JMM's voice (aided by Broadcastify playbacks), the testimony of these significantly trustworthy members of SPARC - who have the guts to ID their stations as opposed to JMM's unrelenting Baofeng harassment of SPARC (which violates all sort of sections of Part 97) I have to publicly reverse my earlier statement and affirm that JMM is no friend of BB's and is still banned from the SPARC repeater (as he is on CLARA, 450, 435 and god knows how many other repeaters now). I've also learned that PHX is more than unhappy with KA6JMM as he has read Flamebook and seen JMM's messages about jamming SPARC, laughing about the Baofeng sirens and demanding apologies from SPARC as well as falsely accusing PHX of driving by JMMs house which I've seen what a genuinely nice guy Johnny is so I know he is the last one to even think about stalking someone tha way JMM did when he repeatedly drove by BB's house, gave out false RDF bearings to BBs house and repeatedly gave out BB's full name and address on W6CDW (before Cliff Wallace permanently banned JMM from that repeater).In reply to the "Hammy Sammy" spammer appropriating my name who blathered: "I've had more discussions with people "in the know" who clarified that JMM was _extremely_ angry with BB for banning him from SPARC..."As anyone who was blamed for the poor behavior of others would be."...and that JMM has spent the last year plus calling BB a sociopath..."I don't know that sociopath is the right word for it, but it's pretty clear that SPARC and its userbase take themselves way too seriously and are highly cliquish, territorial and xenophobic and not very welcoming of people who aren't part of the "in" crowd and, at least in the case of JMM, very much of the "blame the victim" mentality as far as it concerns the harassment you've subjected JMM to.I won't discount the possibility that JMM might have been excessive in his criticism of persons within the SPARC userbase - I personally haven't heard it, nor have you provided actual evidence of it - but, given the circumstances, such could be understandable."...and has even cryptically keyed up on SPARC without ID'ing and said "All he has to do is apologize"."To the extent you can't provide actual audio of such, or that it can be proven that it's JMM making the transmission, your hearsay comments are worth less than spit."Based on these trustworthy members of SPARC's feedback and positive ID of JMM's voice (aided by Broadcastify playbacks)..."Assuming for the moment that it's actually his voice, that also doesn't mean he is responsible for the transmission - as you surely know, being the sort of lowlife that broadcasts such things."...the testimony of these significantly trustworthy members of SPARC..."Ha! Which ones?"...who have the guts to ID their stations as opposed to..."As opposed to the "Hammy Sammy" spammer and his one or two Dark Sleaze who are responsible for, among other acts of harassment, repeatedly broadcasting vulgar, homophobic comments over JMM and his correspondents on at least three amateur repeaters over less than a decade in an obsessively coordinated campaign of stalkerish behavior - that they've proudly chronicled here in the manner of a "manifesto" ala other sociopaths such as George Sodini, Roy Den Hollander et al."JMM's unrelenting Baofeng harassment of SPARC..."I'm aware of no evidence whatsoever, nor have you provided any evidence whatsoever, of JMM being responsible for any Part 97 violations with regard to the SPARC repeater. I have been and continue to be open to the examination of any such evidence that may exist or that you may at some point provide, but as of this moment, the only thing you've provided is a lot of nonsensical, unsubstantiated claims. Beyond lacking any foundation for your claims, to say nothing of your stalkerish, obsessive, creepy and, frankly, entirely ridiculous behavior, you've shown yourself to have zero credibility be an entirely dishonest individual by your appropriation of proper names, unique FCC-issued call signs, screen names and monikers of other people, your posting of phony warning letters, license cancellations and your defamatory - as well as easily dis-proven - claims of criminal activity on the part of JMM, up to and including the molestation of children."I have to publicly reverse my earlier statement and affirm that JMM is no friend of BB's and is still banned from the SPARC repeater, he knows those posts were authored by you or the one or two Dark Sleaze, and not JMM."...I know he is the last one to even think about stalking someone tha way..."You have by repeatedly trespassing on or adjacent to JMM's property, photographing it and repeatedly posting those pictures to the web, along with alleged phone numbers, eMail addresses and the addresses of other people whom he allegedly associates with?"...JMM did when he repeatedly drove by BB's house..."Forgetting for a moment that there is no actual proof that JMM has ever driven by BB's property, let alone "repeatedly", there is abundant evidence - posted here by you - that you have approached [and likely trespassed] on JMM's property numerous times; it's interesting - not to mention hypocritical - that you imagine such behavior constitutes stalking - except when you do it.I understand why you don't want to focus on that aspect of the matter."...repeatedly gave out BB's full name and address on W6CDW (before Cliff Wallace permanently banned JMM from that repeater)."You mean his full name that's on his publicly published FCC-issued amateur radio license? To say nothing of numerous social media websites whereupon BB himself has not only posted his name, but numerous pieces of information about himself, his likes/dislikes, hobbies, activities - even restaurants he frequents? Sites that are frequently brought up by him and discussed among the SPARC userbase on the 446.6400 repeater that can be heard across a wide swath of Southern California - and the entire world via Broadcastify?Also, it's not actually clear that JMM is "banned" from CDW. Yes, he was removed as a control operator and there was at some point bad blood between him, Cliff Wallace and one or two other operators - again, this primarily because of YOUR Part 97-violating behaviors - but my understanding is that JMM's current state of not using CDW is more because of his unhappiness with people he perceived to be his friends who, for whatever reason, ceased having his back under the pressure of your obsessive, creepy, stalkerish, FCC-rule-violating campaign of harassment that's gone on for more than five years and that you dreamed up in response to hurt feelings that could go back as far as twenty years.I can see why you're constantly pointing the finger elsewhere rather than discussing your own misdeeds. In reply to the "Hammy Sammy" spammer or one of his one or two Dark Sleaze posting as "not SPARC" who said:"It's quite evident Hammy Sammy will have no one collaborate his projections of SPARC or it's rank and file." With regard to the things I've heard from various people associated with the SPARC userbase, I never suggested that those things were authoritative as opposed to anecdotal. The purpose was to stir discussion which may lead to the discovery of authoritative evidence.AND, not to put to fine a point on it, you neither offered a statement that was attributed to a specific individual, nor did you respond to my request for you to do so. So, while whining about me offering an unattributed, anecdotal claim [which I never suggested was anything but], you yourself have offered unattributed, anecdotal claims - which, clearly, you imagine have more validity for no other reason than that they come from you.The lack of self-awareness on your part continues to be astounding."The endless obsessive posts by Hammy Sammy..."Actually, far from being "endless", you'll only see comments on this topic from me going back to March of this year - that, as contrasted against those of the "Hammy Sammy" spammer and his one or two anonymous boot-lickers that go back YEARS to nearly the beginning of this incarnation of the Flamebook."...appear petty and envy driven."So.... you think my relative few comments on the matter are "petty"... Compared to what? The significantly larger volume of posts on this subject that predated mine by at least five years?Do tell: are the large number of posts viciously mocking JMM's appearance "petty" in your view?How about the great number of posts referring to his former spouses or children - including the entirely inappropriate pictures of those people that have no business being posted here, as well as the despicable commentary on his alleged family issues; are those things "petty" in your view?How about the large volume of comments that, with no evidence whatsoever, accuse JMM of various nefarious activities with regard to amateur radio, including the phony warning letter, the phony license cancellation and the false allegation of being charged with various criminal acts in the "stalking" category; are these things "petty" in your view?What about the relentless whining of the "Hammy Sammy" spammer over having his identity allegedly compromised because he was careless in discarding a bit of personal information [which could have only been discovered because he was caught during one of his excursions to JMM's property that he's respassed on and photographed numerous times to post pictures here to no legitimate purpose whatsoever], when by that point he'd gleefully published the fruits of his own stalkerish behavior numerous times on this website? Is such behavior not entirely petty, not to mention hypocritical?If you imagine all those things that have been published here long before I ever commented on this topic are something other than "petty", please explain why - if you're intellectually capable."Hammy Sammy should look at the sum of SPARCs parts and their activities outside the actual repeater use itself."I have no quarrel with nor criticism of SPARC's activities aside from this relatively minor point, so I'm not sure why I should do that. I've subjected neither SPARC as a whole or its userbase to undeserved or xcessive criticism.I've legitimately questioned the behavior of a single member of that userbase with regard to how he treated his brother amateur when his brother amateur was subject to relentless harassment over the air by persons violating Part 97 rules.One wonders why YOU haven't done the same."Hammy Sammy the self imposed Judge, Jury, Jailor, and Jesus of the ham hobby..."That you, in your delusion, may imagine that I see myself that way does not make it so."...is not taking into account everything SPARC stands for..."Giving them the benefit of the doubt, one presumes that they stand for the advancement and the betterment of the amateur radio hobby through friendship and fellowship among the brotherhood of licensed, legal amateur radio operators within the guidelines of the Amateur's Code.Which is why it's hard to understand why they would blame their brother amateur for the activities of people who there is no good reason to believe are licensed amateurs who are very clearly violating FCC rules simply to harass an individual for no good reason other than that said individual might, at some time as far back as two decades ago, hurt the feelings of one of the people responsible for the rule-breaking [by standing up for himself and not allowing that person to subject him to bullying].If you're intellectually capable of offering a cogent explanation, I would enjoy hearing it."...which leads us to the former sentence about envy and petty"Hammy "Snitchboy" Sammy the self-imposed Judge, Jury, Jailor, and Jesus of the "Brotherhood of Licensed Legal Amateur Radio Operators","Yet again, that you or one of the possibly two anonymous blowhards who echos all your ridiculous talking points, characterizes me so does not make it so, nor does it mean that I have presented myself as such. I haven't.I've casually, cogently attempted to obtain information about your creepy and obsessive half-decade+ crusade of buffoonery and defamation on this website which, by your implication, is a result of things that went on as much as twenty years ago - and very likely weren't all that important then."Anonymous Boot-Licker and Defender of KA6JMM..."I'm merely asking questions about your unsubstantiated claims. You could have easily answered my questions and, in so doing, provided a legitimate basis for criticism of JMM.Only you know why you're so spun up by my legitimate quest for information."Trollish Spammer of Flamebook..."That my comments may be, occasionally, lengthy or wordy, doesn't make them spam.Even if I was engaged in "trolling" - I'm not - or if my comments could legitimately be described as "spam" - they can't - you'd be in no position to take issue with it, having legitimately spammed this website for over five years with ridiculous commentary and graphics."...generating a massively hypocritical harassment manifesto of Endless Undeserved or Excessive Criticisms..."I've subjected no person to "harassment" or to "endless" or "excessive" criticism."...with despicable commentary viciously bullying mocking and defaming LEGALLY licensed amateur radio operators (UZS,LYI, RJI, YDO etc.)"I have not "defamed" any of those people; to "defame" someone, you have to accuse them of something they're demonstrably not guilty of [generally, criminal activity or some gross sexual misconduct]. An example of such activity would be falsely accusing someone of molesting children - the way you have falsely accused people of molesting children. By contrast, I've accused no person at all - in particular those listed people - of any such thing.In point of fact, I have no idea who "LYI" is supposed to be.Beyond that, none of my commentary about any of the above could legitimately be characterized as "vicious" or "bullying".Mocking, sure - but always in way that is commiserate with their poor behavior."...Operating Wholly without offering a single shred of authoritative evidence, photographs, documents, links, or audio recordings..."The amount of evidence that exists online of the poor behavior of anyone I've ever been critical of here is literally overwhelming, and very much a matter of public record.One need only go to Youtube and type in the call-signs N6UZS, KE6YDO, KE6RJI, K6MWT, KD6CQS, etc., and you'll be treated to a veritable feast of ridiculousness that each and every one of those operators has engaged in gleefully.That's saying nothing of audio posted to websites like soundboard.com, clyp.com, Facebook and several private websites that host hours of content displaying the poor behavior of those operators and others associated with the 435 repeater.Here are just a few samples of some of the worst of those operators:N6UZS repeatedly using racial slurs in reference to KC6UBP: ...and these are just a few examples of things I've legitimately criticized those operators for."...let alone he's incapable of or unwilling to provide any evidence of his own possession of a valid Amateur Radio License...I'm perfectly capable of doing it, but why should I do what you're unwilling to?"...but instead Hammy "SnitchBoy" Sammy endlessly repeats, retypes and regurgitates/reformats limitless mentally defective opinions, baseless accusations, shrill lies, relentless whining and petty half-truths..."I'm not sure how an opinion in and of itself can be "mentally defective", but with regard to the rest of it, not one allegation I've raised has been "baseless", nothing I've said is false or "half-true". I suppose to the person whose commentary I'm critical of, it could be viewed as whining - but only for the fact that you can't deal with being criticized in a way that's entirely tame compared to your own despicable comments."...as well as repetitively demanding documentation, evidence and other "proof" which he never, ever provides (notice that?).."You mean like I just did above? Not that it was necessary because many of those videos have been linked to here before and the despicable behavior of all of those operators is widely known and discussed almost daily, and there is ample evidence of it on several places online.This, as contrast to your "evidence" of the poor character of JMM which simply doesn't exist anywhere aside from in a few short audio clips, none of which actually display any behavior equivalent to that which you've just seen evidence of from those people I'm critical of [along with many others who have posted those clips and many others long before I showed up], and none of which actually fits with your own description of the audio."...outside of asserting laughable "discussions with people in the know" without ever offering a statement that was attributed to a specific individual (nor will he respond to requests to do so)..."Again, I COULD do that, but doing so would betray a confidence. I know it's crazy but there are people out there who really don't like the idea of being smeared as child molesters simply for disagreeing with you.And why do you imagine you deserve to know the identities of people who aren't even part of this discussion when you, despite making many and serious allegations, refuse to reveal your own?"...but instead doubles down on the childish validity of his own spam-like, generic, repetitive, unattributed, anecdotal claims while being incapable of offering a cogent explanation..."None of your comments make sense, friend. You honestly come off as retarded. "...for his obsession with being the sole voice on Flamebook on all matters pertaining to KA6JMM..."Again, I'm merely seeking information about why you've chosen to dedicate at least half a decade of your life to making lame comments on this website about a person who, based on all available evidence, might be somewhat goofy in his activities as a ham radio operator but is otherwise harmless."...who after five bans..."Almost all of which can be credited to your illegal activities on the radio."...is no longer a welcomed individual in the brotherhood of licensed, legal amateur radio operators..."The brotherhood of amateur radio encompasses far more than either of the "renegade" repeaters, the largely unused "CLARA" repeater, the W6CDW repeater or the seemingly confused about it's identity - is it another "renegade" repeater or is it a "good buddy" repeater? - SPARC.With the exception of CLARA, the amateur community generally views the repeaters JMM has had problems on - due almost entirely to your illegal activities - are viewed as "problem" repeaters - sometimes unfairly - where only LIDS perate.Given the buffoonery you hear in the clips above, some of which comes from the owner of 435 and four of his "control operators" [among whom can be counted a person banned from 435 at least four times by four different repeater owners], that's not an entirely unfair characterization of things.So the bans you keep making a big deal about, which you caused to happen in large part - while operating illegally, mean very little. I hold out hope that at some point you'll have some reply that isn't nonsensical and that actually addresses the issue. In re: to "Not the FCC" - who SHOULD be with the FCC, but for the fact that the FCC doesn't generally employ people with common sense and critical thinking skills - who said: "Amateur radio is ONLY for communicating with other licensed amateur stations who clearly identify with their amateur service call sign. Any amateur displaying poor operating practices and even better yet who is _documented_ displaying such poor behavior is to be condemned. Wouldn't you agree?" Generally I would. That said, the criticism of RXZ for talking to an "unlicensed" station attached to that video may - MAY - have been a misstatement. In that specific instance, an argument could - COULD - be made that Joan should be classified as "third-party-traffic". Now, obviously, she herself did not specifically identify as third-party traffic, nor did any licensee ID and specifically refer to her as TPT operating via their station, or via a non-RF input to the repeater. But it's my understanding that she was getting in via a Roger Blight-approved medium. Now, we know that Roger Blight allows a great many things that are properly classified as rule violations to go on on his repeater, that he allows people who he likes to have "priority" access through VOIP, "private" RF inputs and phone patches, and he has no problem with them violating the rules - specifically not identifying - and that he even encourages his control operators [who are all unrepentant rulebreakers, persons who have boasted of being "bootleggers" (the way Roger has), persons who on a near daily basis jam stations they don't like or who they imagine are jamming them] to violate Part 97 with impunity under the doctrine of, "your repeater, your rules". I believe it's pretty clear that "your repeater, your rules" does not mean that you can violate Part 97, but it doesn't seem to be that Roger or his control operators understand that. So while it may be "approved" by Roger, and while it's clear that he fundamentally misunderstands the doctrine of "your repeater, your rules", AND while it doesn't appear that there was a legitimate operator exercising proper station control during that audio capture, I can see where the FCC's position would be that while there might have been a failure to ID, you're still - effectively - dealing with a person who is operating as third-party traffic. All other criticisms of Henry's poor behavior remain valid as a basis for criticism. And let me take this opportunity to thank you for your well-reasoned thoughts on the matter, and your gentlemanly way of conversing. You get bonus points for your choice of warning letters to cite as a reference. In reply to "Ham Sandwich" who said... honestly, I'm not sure what most of what you said is supposed to mean. "Casual conversation does not require justification of your motives or invasive inquiries of others." While what goes on here may in abstract be classified "casual" conversation, when you get to the point you're accusing people of, among other things, child molestation, when we know, if nothing else, that there is no sound basis for such an accusation, the motives of the defaming party are a legitimate subject for discussion. Also, the defaming party has dropped hints as to the reasons for his obsessive, creepy campaign of stalkerish harassment; attempting to discern if there is merit to those hints is hardly "invasive". When you stand up in the public square and you point the finger of blame for, among other things, ugly, despicable, criminal sex acts against others, you best be prepared to defend your claims, even if you do it while cowering behind a mask.If you imagine that these questions are "invasive" because the answers may in some way serve to identify the anonymous blowhard who has been spamming here for at least five years, you might consider that if there is, in fact, any legitimate basis for his claims, then KA6JMM already knows who he is.Beyond that, one of this person's claims is that JMM obtained personal information about him from something he carelessly discarded. If that claim is true, JMM not only knows who he is, but he knows that he is responsible, in part if not in total, for the harassment JMM has been subject to on multiple amateur radio repeaters, as well as for that person's stalkerish following of him and photographing of his property."Your purpose is not congruent with the truth". Huh? What's my purpose? What's "the truth"? Which truth? The objective, verifiable, unimpeachable truth based on fact, or subjective, unsubstantiated, unverifiable, unbelievable anecdotes that some people mistakenly label "truth"? "...you have sold nothing." If I were selling something, that might be a problem. I'm seeking knowledge on a particular subject. If you have any, please share. It would be much more interesting than your non-responses. In reply to "Not the FCC" with regard to the offerings of the so-called "Dark Fleas"... I would be cautious of giving too much legitimacy to anything presented by the "Dark Fleas", in particular the "Hammy Sammy" spammer who typically appropriates my handle, KA6JMM's call letters, the call letters of other amateur radio operators, the proper names of people who they aren't and all while spreading falsehoods, half-truths and spun truths. They're known for highly selective editing of their audio clips.
That said, with what's been provided via the "JMM the Model Ham" Soundcloud page - which falsely asserts to be controlled by KA6JMM and which falsely portrays an innocent Youtuber by the moniker of "Boogie" [who also portrays a character called "Francis"] as though he is JMM to viciously and needlessly mock JMM [and, in effect, "Boogie"] for being overweight - is an example of poor operating practices.
Indeed, persons who purport to be model hams should not engage with unidentified stations. In this instance their criticism of JMM is warranted. Unfortunately, this same "group" [of, at best, three people] who refer to themselves as "Dark Fleas" has also followed KA6JMM to multiple repeaters, harassing him with - often vulgar and obscene - recordings over a period of time much longer than the 22:00 minutes of that video, and they've done it while themselves failing to ID - I suspect this is because they don't actually have licenses - and while interfering with licensed operators engaged in legal QSOs. So, consider that when you determine how much weight to give to the ostensibly legitimate criticisms of people known for much more egregious rule violations across a much longer period of time - months, if not years - as compared to these entirely tame technical violations. In reply to the peculiar comments of "The Dark Fleas", who said: "Note that in all of what Hammy Sammy wrote he offered no evidence whatsoever that the recordings are incorrect or fake." I find it interest that you state that I pen "decent responses", which you seemingly neither read - or read with comprehension - nor, generally, respond to substantively. As far as it concerns whether or not these particular recordings were "fake", my previous response to "Not the FCC" did not assert that those particular recordings were fake. What I did say was that audio provided in the past by the "Hammy Sammy" spammer was selectively edited - which it is and was. As for being "incorrect", within the context of the conversations I've been attempting to have with your "team" since March, it's incorrect to assert that any of the audio provided - most at my request - has either been "evidence" of any great wrongdoing on the part of JMM, or that it's been even slightly "provocative". When I think of poor operators, I think of audio such as that that was illustrated in all of those video captures I put up links to in my last response to your alleged associate the "Hammy Sammy" spammer; nothing either of you have offered amounts to anything more than the mundane, frankly boring conversation of average "good buddy" hams; there is nothing provocative or even controversial in anything audio you've attributed to JMM. In fact, I believe only the last few minutes of your capture which allegedly includes Audio over seven different days - an average of just over three minutes per conversation - is JMM allegedly talking directly to a "squeaky", yet you only hear the squeaky in that conversation. So, not to put too fine a point on it, but for all you seem to believe that your alleged many hours of recordings of this obscure, seemingly harmless individual you're so obsessed with amounts to something, all I hear is relatively benign conversation of otherwise model hams who happen to occasionally address an unidentified operator for short a duration. Your work is the equivalent of a busybody neighbor standing outside with a camera watching his neighbor's grass grow, hoping to catch it at the point it grows beyond a certain height so you can bellow far and wide that your neighbor is violating an HOA rule, or perhaps some layabout with a stopwatch trying to catch people doing 40 MPH where it's marked 35, but behaving as though you have Epstein evidence. "All his efforts were directed at attacking our little team, calling names and other keyboard warrior tactics..." The only name which I referred to your "team" by in my previous post was your moniker, "the Dark Fleas". If you're complaining about my previous references to you as, "Dark Sleaze", do remember that members of your so-called "team" accuse people of, among other things, molesting children - falsely. You really are in no position to whine about name calling or these "keyboard warrior" tactics you're referring to; again I'll remind you that your "team" has spent more than half a decade using this site as a platform for defamation and harassment of a person who's greatest "sin" appears to be being highly boring. "The recordings are extremely solid samples of those four hams repeatedly violating part 97..." While exchanging with unidentified operators is a poor practice, the "solid" examples you've provided are, as I said, the equivalent of catching someone doing 40 in a 35 zone and are perhaps, the most ridiculous and petty things you could possibly complain about as far as it concerns violations of the rules or simply bad acting on a SoCal 2m/70cm repeater. When compared to the poor operating practices of, among others, those people singled out by callsign in the video captures I offered previously, these examples pale in comparison. "...and were chosen to show how a bad control operator can encourage others to ignore the rules. As a side note, the repeater owner first asked KA6JMM to step down as control operator. As JMM continued to talk to the squeakies as well as engage in other poor behavior the owner issued an edict that NO ONE was to communicate with the unidentified stations or they would be permanently banned. We have that recording too 😎." While we would find common ground on your initial point, if you're referring to the audio that was posted here recently at my request, then the edict not to communicate with unidentified stationed was issued NOT as a result of JMM or anyone else talking to a "squeaky", but to people on the W6CDW repeater - JMM mostly, but others as well - rightly having bad reactions to unidentified persons - persons who are a part of your "team" - maliciously interfering with the legal communications of licensed stations using vulgar, obscene recordings and whispering voices making homophobic comments about JMM. If you're attempting to assert that the problems on that repeater were due primarily to various operators there talking to "squeakies" while there was no other traffic on the repeater, as opposed to the activities of members of your "team" operating without benefit of call, maliciously interrupting the legal operations of all the legitimate users of that repeater during peak usage - specifically to harass and ridicule JMM - then you're simply being dishonest, and I suspect you know it. As for that final paragraph, there's not good reason to quote it; while you're correct in your assertions, you're also entirely hypocritical; you call out a minor infraction while, if not actively engaging in, support people and fail to call out people who have engaged in much more significant rule violations. There seems to be a lot of sarcasm in your couple of post so, again, I think you know that you're acting in a completely hypocritical way, and that you imagine you're somehow making a legitimate point against a person you have a highly irrational obsession with. In reply to "Miss Piggy" who said: "Why Hammy Sammy do you only fight for one person that has been supposedly slandered on Flamebook. There are many on this platform that could be eligible for your defense and truth services. Ham Sandwich, Jimmy Houghton, Roger Bly, and many more have been accused of many of these similar allegations..." First off, I don't know KA6JMM personally - not that I'm sure that would matter - so your previous correspondent is - can you imagine? - not telling the truth. In point of fact I have spoken up before when people have crossed-the-line in reference to others; while I did so holding my nose, I spoke out when someone made disgusting comments about Roger Blight's young non-combatant daughter that had no place in the conversation. I don't know what's allegedly been said about "Ham Sandwich" who, like JMM, I don't know, and I don't believe his true identity is known. I wonder whether or not either he or Jimmy Houghten have ever been falsely accused of gross criminal acts like child molestation the way the "Hammy Sammy" spammer has often accused JMM of such - falsely. I'd like to think that if I was aware of such things, I would speak up in those instances as well. In reply to "Miss Piggy" who said: "Child molesting accusations have been leveled against Jimmy, BB, Ham Sandwich, Roger, Perry, Johnny PHX, OG, the Martin's, etc." I can't specifically remember any instance of such an allegation here, but I will take your word for it. To my knowledge, NONE of those people have ever been legitimately suspected of, charged with or convicted of any such act. In point of fact, I'm only aware of two instances of an amateur radio operator being legitimately convicted of a sex crime against a child; one I can't remember the call-sign, but he actually had his license revoked due to outcry from the amateur radio community [a 7-call, if I remember correctly], and the other was a 4-call who'd last resided in FL who'd been convicted both there and in Arizona [and was listed in the FL sex offender registry], and he'd been suspected of criminal sex acts in the US Virgin Islands as well. He, thankfully, has been dead for a number of years. He was a 14.300/14.313 critter, and would have been right at home on 435. In more recent years, another 14.313 scumbag, known for gleefully talking about how he planned to move to Puerto Rico or Jamaica and hook up with a "little Latina girl" [he was in his mid-60s at the time] was also charged with molesting his own stepdaughter, though that never went to trial. Because he felt he'd been railroaded - he said the ex-wife put the daughter up to the claim - he liked to go around calling others molesters. He, too, is dead and, if there's any cosmic justice, frying as we speak, lowlife that he was. "It's almost a default move on the repeater or Flamebook if you don't agree with someone." It actually seems to be something of a default attack across amateur radio, honestly. Frankly, I'm amazed that someone hasn't been successfully sued for it. Yes, legally amateur radio operators are limited purpose public figures, but it seems like a hard case to make that there is any way you can - absent a credible allegation, a criminal charge or a conviction - argue that you're NOT recklessly disregarding the truth if you accuse someone of being a child molester.
"I am not sure if repeater chat or Flamebook postings are taken that seriously." Generally, they're not.
And, like you said, some of these other people have been so accused - but apparently so infrequently that I don't recall the comments. By contrast, the "Hammy Sammy" spammer et al have made that false allegation about JMM dozens of times on this website - very likely while commenting using a VPN, TOR or some other sort of proxy server which masks their true IP address - and, obviously, without using their real name. Anyone who would stoop to falsely accusing a person of that most vile of criminal acts over an amateur radio dispute is a lowlife of the highest order. Good grief the "Snitchboy" Spammer has been busy this AM... And wow, your list of nonsense is repetitive. Let's delve into some of these ridiculous whining points:"I thought I would share my tiresome and repetitive "Twenty Internet Debate Techniques For Defending KA6JMM" which I am sure of everyone on Flamebooke being so tired of:"I'm not sure how many people who use the FB actually care about this little back-and-forth between us, but if the alternative is your lame edited pictures of JMM with the homophobic commentary and obsession with gay sex acts or the disgusting pictures of obese bellies, I suspect they'll go with my comments - of which there has only been one this AM, despite your spam-posting with my name."1. It has to be a HUGE post!"As I've said before, it should be of sufficient length to respond to the "argument" - to the extent your spam constitutes a legitimate argument - and to sufficiently hit all the relevant points. And, of course, I use the word "relevant" loosely so far as it concerns your remarks."2. The post must total at least three screaming-for-attention screen scrolls and thousands of words." ."If there is anything petty about the current state of affairs - beyond the fact that there is ANYONE on the planet who is that much of a mentally defective person that this is the way they'd attempt to deal with a grudge over what amounts to little more than hurt feelings stemming from things that occurred as far back as the late 90s or early 2000s - it's pettiness in the way JMM has been treated by some people within the amateur radio community and EXTREME pettiness on the part of those who have and who continue to engage in harassment of that person."Hammy Sammy should meet SPARC face to face to convey his questions, comments, and concerns."Why? I don't believe the persons - yourself included - using the Flamebook as their harassment "manifesto" against JMM are truly affiliated with SPARC nor do I believe their peculiar behavior would be approved generally by members of that group. Further, I don't believe they follow this page. To the extent I've already spoken to certain people within that group in an attempt to find some answers that you seem incapable or unwilling to provide, they don't seem to think there is much value in what occurs here. In reply to the "Hammy Sammy" spammer - who seems to not understand the concept of paragraphs - who blathered:"For the record let's sum up Hammy "SnitchBoy" Sammy's obsessive Flamebook activities"I'm engaged in no "obsessive" activities. My commentary here is entirely casual. ..."I never suggested that JMM and YGC were "friends". I stated that I have heard from others who purport to be in a position to know and who are actually credible that they have "settled their differences" with regard to the legitimate bad blood between them caused by your stalkerish behavior and your violations of FCC rules. I also never suggested that JMM was welcome back on SPARC."...as he is on CLARA, 450..."I'm not aware of him being legitimately banned from either 450 or 435 under their current operators; he had been banned from 435 by a previous owner who banned numerous long-time 435ers for no specially good reason, including a current 435 control operator [who was, in fact, banned by two other 435 tewards prior to the current one]. It's perfectly evident that his state of not being welcome on either SPARC or CDW is entirely due to the coordinated, obsessive and stalkerish campaign of harassment you've subjected him to on those repeaters. While I have no specific evidence of the situation on CLARA - a very "good buddy", straight-laced system which is largely unused - actually was, but I have no reason to doubt it was any different than that which exists on CDW and SPARC."I've also learned that PHX is more than unhappy with KA6JMM as he has read Flamebook and seen JMM's messages about jamming SPARC..."And, if PHX is anything other than a complete retard….
 < Previous 20
Page:
Next 20 >  

Back to THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK!

Contact administrator at flamebook@gmx.com