KD6CQS.com




THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK!

Send anonymous repeater donations with
BitCoin to 3JgMzZgwSriyx1asH6SMZf49Hvxhee9CbW

450 Sunday Night Trivia
With your host Sue KD6UVD
8PM Pacific

Listen to 147.450 LIVE:



Email 450Renegaderadio@gmail.com for repeater donations.
Email flamebook@gmx.com for Flamebook issues.




17,282 Entries
Hammy Sammy 
08/09

Comments:
Part 1


I, Hammy "Snitchboy" Sammy the self-imposed Judge, Jury, Jailor, and Jesus of the "Brotherhood of Licensed Legal Amateur Radio Operators", Anonymous Boot-Licker and Defender of KA6JMM, Trollish Spammer of Flamebook, generating a massively hypocritical harassment manifesto of Endless Undeserved or Excessive Criticisms with despicable commentary viciously bullying mocking and defaming LEGALLY licensed amateur radio operators (UZS,LYI, RJI, YDO etc.), Operating Wholly without offering a single shred of authoritative evidence, photographs, documents, links, or audio recordings let alone he's incapable of or unwilling to provide any evidence of his own possession of a valid Amateur Radio License but instead Hammy "SnitchBoy" Sammy endlessly repeats, retypes and regurgitates/reformats limitless mentally defective opinions, baseless accusations, shrill lies, relentless whining and petty half-truths as well as repetitively demanding documentation, evidence and other "proof" which he never, ever provides (notice that?) outside of asserting laughable "discussions with people in the know" without ever offering a statement that was attributed to a specific individual (nor will he respond to requests to do so) but instead doubles down on the childish validity of his own spam-like, generic, repetitive, unattributed, anecdotal claims while being incapable of offering a cogent explanation for his obsession with being the sole voice on Flamebook on all matters pertaining to KA6JMM who after five bans is no longer a welcomed individual in the brotherhood of licensed, legal amateur radio operators confining their activities to the guidelines, rules, FCC code and generally accepted behavior within the Amateur's Code.

That's me, Hammy "SnitchBoy" Sammy in a nutshell ('cause I’m a delusional nut exhibiting exceedingly peculiar behavior via Flamebook) Here is all of my ridiculously and overly wordy spam defending the FCC Rules violating KA6JMM from just a couple a days of my recent posts– (not including what I spam under all of the other pseudonyms full of imgur images) Now you have to read my effluvia all over again…
This from a person who has, over the past five years, spam-posted so great a volume of nonsense to this site that one can go pages seeing your own comments. Interestingly, but for maybe four comments on this page, and maybe one or two from others, this whole page and most of the last two are all your garbage.Oh, and perhaps one or two of the dark sleaze."I love to parse and quote a few words entirely out of context"For instance?"It needs to be twice as long as those Ascii Dick Pics I used to post all the time."I have no concrete proof you - the "Hammy Sammy" Spammer - were the ASCII spammer from a couple of years back, though it wouldn't surprise me."3. Deny, deny, deny! I get caught red handed but like any 3 year old I just deny over and over."I'm not sure exactly what you've caught me "red handed" doing. At least, in so far as you've actually proven anything you've claimed. It bears repeating that the only time you've ever made an attempt to prove something you've claimed - when you posted a few mundane audio clips at my request - they didn't come within an astronomical unit of proving any of your tall tales about JMM."4. Defend KA6JMM in the most suspicious and vigorous way possible"I'm not sure there's anything "suspicious" about me asking for proof that he's engaged in any misdeeds you've accused him of - and you've failed spectacularly to prove even your silliest claims about him, such as that it's a demonstrable fact that he was responsible for "jamming" SPARC on the various occasions you've claimed that he was."...yet at the same time I claim I don't know him and I don't live in the area, LOL!"
I've been pretty clear in that I "know" him the exact same way you do - by reputation, and as a voice on the radio. I've never met him and I've never been in the same room as him. I wonder if he and I have ever actually been in the same State, though I suppose anything is possible.Also, the extent to which he and I "know" each other is entirely irrelevant as far as it concerns YOUR demonstrably false and unproven claims about him."Talk about a creepy obsession!"Well, to my credit I've merely authored a handful of comments asking why it is that he lives rent free in your head - as he clearly does. People can label things as they will, but how that's "creepy" compared to a person who, among other things, travels who knows how far on numerous occasion to photograph another person's property and post pictures of it on the web along with numerous unsubstantiated if not demonstrably false allegations of criminal acts, I'm sure I don't know.The only reasonable explanation is that mentally defective people - such as yourself - rarely acknowledge their own defects, and often engage in the same sort of finger-pointing you do in an attempt to talk around their poor behavior."People might think we are cyber lovers if I'm not careful."
Careful, your displays of sexual dysfunction are becoming legion - much more than your dark sleaze.
"5. I know KA6JMM SO WELL (but deny I know him in the same breath)"This sort of obfuscation borders on ridiculous."...that I can declare he does not need to use this website but he is all over "social media"."
You insist on claiming that he's using his website, going so far as to state which screen names he's using. I've yet to see a shred of proof from you that he's using any of those names, and plenty which indicates not only is he not the author of posts from those names, but that those posts are coming from you - the same way you're using "Hammy Sammy" and "Model Ham" to post comments."6. Every Flamebook message from KA6JMM attacking BB & SPARC just can't be JMM so accuse someone else of authoring them."Please provide substantive proof that JMM is the author of any posts to this website.[That you say so doesn't constitute substantive proof]."7. KA6JMM is well known for harassment and defamation of other hams..."Then you should have no problem illustrating that with some sort of concrete, unimpeachable evidence. Who, specifically, has he "harassed"? "Defamed"? What actions can you prove he's engaged in that cross the line of typical amateur radio back-and-forth into "harassment", and where are the charges and convictions for this behavior? What statements has he made that constitute "defamation"? Where were these statements recorded? Who has he made these statements against? As defamation has a clear legal definition, it would bolster your case to illustrate where he's been taken to court and found liable for such behavior. Please provide evidence."...but declare any mocking of JMM as "cowardly"."I don't know about "any". Yours generally is."Because I claim I don't live in SoCal how would I know his history anyhow?"You've heard the phrase, "He [or she] who asserts must prove".You're the person making claims that another party has engaged in criminal acts - including serious criminal acts like child molestation, not me."Oh right, invoke the-"not on the Internet"-claim-makes-it-invalid even though the Internet does not truly encompass the sum of human experience and knowledge."I've never suggested that what you've alleged - with no proof whatsoever - couldn't be true simply because evidence of such can't be found on the internet. Go back to our earliest exchange; you'll find I said pretty much the exact opposite of that.The TRUE state of affairs is that you've provided NO PROOF WHATSOEVER of anything you've alleged against this man.That's saying nothing of how when you actually took the time to offer what in your mentally diseased mind was "proof" - a few meager, mundane sound clips - of your many and serious allegations, said "proof" didn't prove what you alleged.Not only that, when asked for proof, you not only take it as a personal insult, but you go out of your way to personally attack the person who dares you to ask."8. Never offer any proof but DEMAND it at every turn, because, well, that is my right."What exactly do you want me to offer proof of? That JMM isn't here? That's pretty obvious. You're the one insisting that he is, yet you've failed to prove it.You're the one insisting he's engaged in some huge amount of, "harassment" [do you even know the legal definition of the word?], yet can't even bother to state who specifically he's "harassed" or what he said/did that constitutes "harassment".And no, legally, bloviating about how a certain person likes a certain restaurant isn't, "harassment"."9. Deflect by claiming I don't deflect, LOL!"That's two "LOLs" so far for you; we'll come back to that near the end.Anyone who isn't mentally defective can clearly see that not only am I not deflecting, I'm going to great lengths to respond to each and every point you try to make, no matter how irrelevant."10. Create giant ridiculous posts..."Like the one I'm responding to? I understand it makes the post bigger, but about half of the post is me quoting you so that it can't be legitimately said that I'm ignoring or deflecting."...but accuse others of not using Proof & Logic. I mean, answering sentence-by-sentence is logical and not obsessively anal, right?"Actually, answering line-by-line is entirely logical.Whatever else you might want to say, I'm showing you at least enough respect to answer you completely.You might try doing the same.But of course, you imagine yourself to be some superior sort of life-form, and too good for the usual pleasantries. After all, you imagine people you're harassing and defaming have some how done you wrong because they don't simply roll over and take it. As the assuredly one and only Hammy Sammy I thought I would share my tiresome and repetitive "Twenty Internet Debate Techniques For Defending KA6JMM" which I am sure of everyone on Flamebooke being so tired of:1. It has to be a HUGE post! If I don't type a voluminous accusatory response to every part of every sentence I feel threatened that somebody somewhere will think I am not "winning" some super important cyber-argument. I must dominate Flamebook!2. The post must total at least three screaming-for-attention screen scrolls and thousands of words. I love to parse and quote a few words entirely out of context and concoct very long and very goofy paragraphs in response. It needs to be twice as long as those Ascii Dick Pics I used to post all the time.3. Deny, deny, deny! I get caught red handed but like any 3 year old I just deny over and over.4. Defend KA6JMM in the most suspicious and vigorous way possible yet at the same time I claim I don't know him and I don't live in the area, LOL! Talk about a creepy obsession! People might think we are cyber lovers if I'm not careful.
5. I know KA6JMM SO WELL (but deny I know him in the same breath) that I can declare he does not need to use this website but he is all over "social media".6. Every Flamebook message from KA6JMM attacking BB & SPARC just can't be JMM so accuse someone else of authoring them.7. KA6JMM is well known for harassment and defamation of other hams but declare any mocking of JMM as "cowardly". Because I claim I don't live in SoCal how would I know his history anyhow? Oh right, invoke the-"not on the Internet"-claim-makes-it-invalid even though the Internet does not truly encompass the sum of human experience and knowledge.8. Never offer any proof but DEMAND it at every turn, because, well, that is my right.9. Deflect by claiming I don't deflect, LOL!10. Create giant ridiculous posts but accuse others of not using Proof & Logic. I mean, answering sentence-by-sentence is logical and not obsessively anal, right?11. In the most ludicrous manner possible accuse others of not having a ham license, with no basis in fact, yet never ever offer up evidence of my own "call sign".12. Use a tenet of my favorite book Mein Kampf; repeat a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously"13. When anyone copies my technique I will label it as lame appropriation and unrepentant lying. Multisyllable false accusations are somehow more effective in my head.14. Keep trolling for information, throw out the same baseless accusations in every sentence: no license, no privileges, jamming various amateur radio repeaters without IDing, etc. In one breath say someone doesn't have a license and in the next infer it must be a lesser license while hoping for a corrective response. Lame to think it will work but keep trying!15. Repeatedly accuse others of "projecting" because, well, much like a cross-dressing Ham Radio Mary Poppins I am practically perfect in every way.16. Repetitively invoke "libel" yet falsely accuse others of all sorts of heinous crimes without any proof.17. Yet again, invoke gross defamation when I accuse others of jamming without a license (here I am projecting evidence of how often I jam with no ID on 20/40/80 meters as well as local repeaters)18. Spend hours and hours posting these giant screen wasters but accuse others of spending too much time withoutadmitting I am a decrepit dinosaur when it comes to Internet techniques.19. Be sure to liberally add "LOL" at the end of many sentences, LOL20. Embody the the classic techniques of the unrepentant liar and freely accuse others of being liars.Feel free to use these Solid Gold Debate Techniques over and over and look like a cyber-winner too! JMM is a lesser being too, right? HOW DARE HE object to being followed from repeater to repeater and jammed with homophobic nonsense by an unidentified whisperer, right? And, honestly, HOW DARE HE have a problem with a creep on the internet following him around, taking pictures of his house, posting them on the internet and calling him a child molester, right? He's such a lesser life-form, he exists to be mistreated by superior beings like you in such ways, right?/sarc on all that, since I'm sure you didn't get it."11. In the most ludicrous manner possible accuse others of not having a ham license, with no basis in fact"Right, clips of you doing it that you posted is, "no basis in fact".Oh, and where have you posted using your call? I must have missed it.I didn't miss you posting using OG's call, or JMMs."...yet never ever offer up evidence of my own "call sign"."I'm under no obligation to publish my own letters. We're not on the air, I'm not pretending to be people I'm not and I'm not on tape jamming without benefit of call."12. Use a tenet of my favorite book Mein Kampf..."It's interesting that you throw out appeals to emotion like that when the only person who attempted to throw out the word, "jewish" as an insult was you."...repeat a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously""Whatever else your lies about JMM et al may be, "colossal" is hardly the word I'd use.Well, at least they're not colossal to anyone else. You, personally, seem to allow him to occupy a colossal amount of real estate in your own mind."13. When anyone copies my technique I will label it as lame appropriation and unrepentant lying."It's a demonstrable fact that you've lied; it's been pointed out and well illustrated, and bears no immediate rehashing.That's saying nothing of the claims you've made that are simply unsubstantiated - as well as unable to be substantiated. Yet you repeat them so often and with such fervor, and are so vehement in your personal attacks against those that dare question you, that you've elevated your mere unsubstantiated claims to gross falsehoods by yourself."14. Keep trolling for information..."Ah, so we come to the heart of the matter; you really don't want anyone to know who you are. You're deathly afraid of it for some reason. Among other things that speaks to you not being a licensed amateur radio operator because they generally don't care if people know who they are. But that's a minor point. You've got some sort of secret that you just can't allow anyone to know, and whatever that secret is - it's very likely something no one would care about if they knew it, but it's REALLY important to you [another illustration of your overblown sense of self] - it's tightly wrapped up in this ridiculous vendetta. And you know that you can't prove ANYTHING you've said about JMM without giving up something that will expose you.Nevermind that JMM allegedly knows who you are, or so you've hinted at heavily, if not claimed outright.Is part of this whole nonsensical Flamebook-only grudge that he knows who you are, and doesn't consider you worthy of responding to even on this website few people take seriously?If so, I'm sure that's a huge blow to that ego."...throw out the same baseless accusations in every sentence: no license, no privileges, jamming various amateur radio repeaters without IDing, etc."There's nothing baseless in any of those allegations, and the one about you jamming while not IDing is supported by audio you posted!"In one breath say someone doesn't have a license and in the next infer it must be a lesser license while hoping for a corrective response."So you're saying you're a licensed amateur radio operator of at least General Class? If so, you're using a lot of words to tell me that you're not interested in having a voice QSO to talk about your many and serious allegations about JMM because doing so would expose your identity as you'd have to ID on 20 to talk to me."15. Repeatedly accuse others of "projecting" because, well, much like a cross-dressing Ham Radio Mary Poppins I am practically perfect in every way."The only cross-dresser in amateur radio that I'm aware of is Roger Blight, whom you defend constantly despite how poor of a steward he's been of 435 and how much of a dishonest, hypocritical individual he is. I suppose you see a kindred spirit in those traits.I wonder, are you kindred spirits in the cross dressing as well?"16. Repetitively invoke "libel"..."Right... because that's what it is when you falsely accuse people of child molestation."...yet falsely accuse others of all sorts of heinous crimes without any proof."Do tell: what "heinous" crime have I "falsely" accused anyone of?"17. Yet again, invoke gross defamation..."See response to item 16."...when I accuse others of jamming without a license..."Yet again, it bears repeating that you posted audio clips of yourself - wait for it - jamming without IDing your station.You also fail to discern that not only is it not "gross defamation" [it's not even defamation, seeing as how it's true] to state that a person is jamming without IDing when they posted audio of themselves jamming without IDing, there's a galaxy of difference between saying that someone is an unidentified jammer [even if it's not true which, in this case, it is] and accusing someone of molesting children.If you don't understand that very basic thing, you're even more of a mentally defective person than you've shown yourself to be with your ridiculous responses to me."18. Spend hours and hours posting these giant screen wasters..."Heh... okay. One more time for those who haven't gotten it yet: five years+ and literally hundreds [if not thousands] of posts of either demonstrably false or unsubstantiated claims about JMM, many of them making claims of serious criminal activity with no basis in fact, posts commenting on following JMM around Wildomar and even out of state, claiming JMM has engaged in "stalking" [whatever that's supposed to mean to the claimant] while posting numerous pictures of his house and giving out all sorts of PI about him, countless GB of doctored image files mocking JMM for being overweight and homophobic commentary, countless allegations of "jamming" with not even an FCC warning letter, LRDF report or near field intercept to back up the claim or even amateur t-hunting data that might make your case vs... not even a couple of dozen posts of mine merely asking for the slightest shred of proof of any of it."19. Be sure to liberally add "LOL" at the end of many sentences, LOL"Like you did three times in this bout of digital diarrhea?In response to the faux Hammy Sammy aka the "Hammy Sammy" Spammer, who said:"Thank you for (indirectly) verifying what we have suspected. Our advice is that you dive deeper into what your "source" has presented to you as facts about some of the topics we've touched upon here."The make-believe world you inhabit must surely be an odd place... In addition to authoring posts ostensibly from JMM so that you can pretend he's here engaging you on the Flamebook, you now have me consulting [or is it "conspiring"?] with some third-party "source" you've conjured. I'm not sure which "facts" you're referring to when you allege that this imaginary source of yours is providing me information because, as per your standard operating procedure, you don't actually engage substantively, you don't legitimately "discuss" things in a reasonable, rational and respectful way and - and this is most important - you never provide anything that comes close to resembling proof of your many extraordinary claims.It's clear from your non-response that I landed many a killshot in my responses to your numerically listed topics, the most damaging being those to items 7 & 14 - which, lets be honest, are the only ones that came close to the heart of the matter.Since it's clear that you have no intention of engaging me in a serious discussion of these topics we've touched upon here, I reiterate my earlier advice to you to seek professional counseling to deal with your obvious 0bsessiveness, paranoid delusions, bigotry and whatever other mental defects plague the actual person cowering behind his [or her?] keyboard and Baofeng before you suffer any more serious real-life consequences - to the extent your previous claims weren't lies like so many others you've published here - along the lines of those you've hinted at dealing with due to your entirely absurd vendetta with the obscure [and, according to all available tangible, verifiable evidence, entirely harmless] amateur radio operator KA6JMM.In response to the faux Hammy Sammy aka the "Hammy Sammy" Spammer, who said:"It saddens us greatly that you are upset with our eschewing your pseudo-reality known as Flamebook."If I had a half-decade+ history of posting hundreds, if not over a thousand comments, without countless bytes of modded graphical images, tall tales, half-truths, spun truths, outright lies and disgusting defamation, and that's not including all your comments pretending to be JMM so you could pretend you weren't talking to yourself, referring to this website as "my" pseudo-reality might have a crumb of validity.As it is, I have no such history while, in case it wasn't clear, you do. Clearly, JMM not only lives rent-free in your head, it's fair to say you've given him complete ownership. One wonders if there isn't a deed to your mental spaces in your county recorder of deeds office showing him as owner, lock, stock and barrel."Scrutinizing items 7-14 is not a high priority with us..."I'm more than aware that answering questions about your highly peculiar - and that's framing it such that it's presented in a light most favorable to you - and creepy obsession with JMM isn't a high priority with you. To answer questions regarding the matter, and to discuss it rationally would cause you a huge problem, for you'd have to acknowledge the ridiculousness of your own behavior.SERIOUS QUESTION:And this is for the general public of the Flamebook, not the very hard at work "Hammy Sammy" spammer [or the one or two "Dark Sleaze"]...IF you know, or if you believe you have a compelling opinion, please explain to me why the amateur radio operator known as "BB", licensee of amateur radio station KG6YGC, is supposed to be immune from criticism.I ask because it seems that the irrational and creepy obsession the "Hammy Sammy" spammer has with the rather obscure and, by all legitimate accounts, relatively harmless [if a bit goofy] operator licensed as KA6JMM seems to be grounded in the idea that anyone, KA6JMM in particular, who is critical of "BB", his management of the SPARC amateur radio repeater at 446.6400 MHz and his way of engaging the userbase of that repeater, no matter how much that criticism may be [and, admittedly, I don't know whether it is, which is why I'm asking] nor how innocuous that criticism might be is somehow deserving of being stalked, harassed, verbally abused and grossly defamed by being falsely accused of, among other crimes, child molestation.I look forward to any and all serious attempts by amateurs, SWLs and denizens of the Flamebook of upstanding character and goodwill to discuss the matter in an uplifting and respectful way such as befitting "fine business" operators who observe the principles of the Amateurs' Code and who are mindful of the rules of Part 97/the Commission's rules and the Basis and Purpose of the amateur radio service. Admin:He may or may not be. I don't think I know him well enough as simply an amateur radio operator to say whether he is or isn't. He does seem to take himself a little too seriously, and he seems to think the SPARC userbase is more high-brow than it actually is.That aside, he can still be a "model ham".Is he, in your opinion, immune from any and all criticism?In reply to "Some Ham" who said: "Who in the hell made Hammy Sammy the Judge, Jury, Jailor, and Jesus of the ham hobby and all of its satellites? Perhaps we regular users of Flamebook should post our opinions of Hammy Sammy and BB should go first."To answer your first question, sir, no one made me, "Judge, Jury, Jailor and Jesus of the ham hobby"... More to the point, I never declared that I was such I thing.I merely asked a question which for some reason has you very triggered.The Admin answered that question - sort of - in the spirit with which it was asked. You might try.Now, since you couldn't answer my first question, I'll try this: who and what is "BB" aka KG6YGC to you, that you seem to feel he is entirely above criticism regardless of whether or not one is a "model ham"?I look forward to your substantive reply!In response to "Another Hit Song":And, in fact, another masterpiece from Mr. Gobblecock et al, who continue to come up with stellar recordings. Well done!In response to "Ham Sandwich" who said:"I am not a SPARC member nor have I always agreed with BB..."So, fundamentally, you agree with the suggestion that he's not above criticism?"This half assed attack on BB is without merit."I have not "attacked" BB/KG6YGC. I have merely asked whether he is above criticism, and whether or not mere criticism warrants, among other things, false allegations of child molestation."Yes the SPARC repeater has an elevated level of technical talk and it may appear high brow to some."My use of the term "high brow" did not refer to conversation regarding the art and science underlying the amateur radio hobby, or conversation of its more technical aspects. My use of the term referred to the general attitude of many persons in that userbase who seem to think they're a better quality of person - as far as it concerns their behavior on the air and their engagement with others in the amateur radio hobby - merely because they hang out on the SPARC repeater and, perhaps, display a greater aptitude for the technical aspects of the hobby.In reply to "Some Ham" who said:You opened yourself up to replies and now you don't like the answers."Your "answers", such as they are, don't address the question. Of course you're under no obligation to answer, but you insist on chiming in and attacking me because I dare ask a harmless question. Obviously, you have nothing more to offer.But thank you for providing an illustration of the sort of behavior I was referring to regarding a number of persons in the "in crowd" of the SPARC userbase in my reply to "Ham Sandwich".In reply to Some Other[?] Goofy Ham calling himself "Judge, Jury" blah blah who said:"You spam us..."Who is "us"? We're all Flamebookers here, and there are no "cliques", unless you're one of the "Hammy Sammy" spammer's one or two Dark Sleaze."...with your wordy babble..."As opposed to the hundreds of posts and millions of words, GIFs and still images of nonsense published by others trashing an obscure and, based on all objective evidence, harmless operator in Lake Elsinore/Wildomar?"...until you believe you have dominated the topic."I'm not even sure we're "discussing" - to the extent you're actually engaging in discussion - a topic, or at least the topic I'm interested in discussing."You have no interests in any replies that don't support your ego-centric narrative."That makes no sense whatsoever. I'm asking a question, and a straightforward question at that, as part of a larger effort to determine why one to three blowhards on this website seem to think a largely obscure and, based on all objective evidence, harmless operator in Lake Elsinore/Wildomar deserves to be, among other things, accused of molesting children and harassed to the tune of hundreds, if not over a thousand comments on this forum from, if not a single individual, no more than three people over half of a decade, and all of that seemingly by persons who's only complaint with him is that he is critical of KG6YGC for - so far as I'm able to determine - treating him poorly because of the behavior of OTHER people.What, specifically, you imagine that has to do with me personally, I'm sure I have no idea.In closing, it seems like the "Hammy Sammy" spammer and his one or two Dark Sleaze would rather waste an incredible amount of time talking around a topic and attacking people who dare to question them on the matter rather than just addressing it in a straightforward fashion.I wonder why?On unhealthy "fixations"...To the frothing-at-the-digital-mouth individual who thinks his effluvia makes some kind of a point, please explain what whether or not a person graduated high school at any particular time has to do with the subject at handIn reply to Richard Francis "Buzz" Clark who said: "Not a shot-caller, just a shit talker."Very true, Buzz... both in the case of UBP, and in the case of these freaks out here who are so obsessed with other hams that they seem to record everything said by a person they have an irrational dislike for that they categorically refuse to explain in any detail so they can go back and find some seeming or alleged inconsistency to whine about. This, despite the fact that no one cares about trifles like whether or not a person graduated in a certain year or the year after.You're so much more profound on FB than on the air, Buzz... Why is that?In reply to "Did you know?" who hilariously said:"Buzz is a FAT FUCK and a GOBBLECOCK?Is it true that Buzz was arrested for pleasuring himself in the parking lot of a JC Penney in Orange?"You are correct sir... BUZ *IS* a fat-fuck AND a gobblecock.Whether or not he ever got caught pleasuring himself in a JC Penny parking lot back in Orange, I don't know.I can surely see BUZ being the sort of person who would do such a thing on a dare with money involved OR while drunk, but I doubt he ever just did it to do it.If he were arrested for such things, there'd surely be a public record.So... is he a fat-fuck? Yes.Is he a gobblecock? Yes.Is he the sort of person you can see publicly pleasuring himself in a JCP parking lot while drunk or on a $5.00 dare - which isn't to say he actually did it, only that you can picture him being the sort who would? Yes.But the REAL question is when did he graduate HS, and did he ever say he graduated the year before? It's questions like THAT that are serious business in hammy radio.n reply to "Did you know?" - who is actually someone other than the previous "Did you know?" poster [who was likely Mr. Gobblecock] and who is almost assuredly either the "Hammy Sammy" spammer who is known to appropriate the names, aliases and call signs of others or one of his possibly two "Dark Sleaze" - who said:"Richard "Buzz" Clark says: "Because Hammy Sammy writes this shit on Flamebook using my name and then replies to himself as Hammy Sammy. Duh."Actually, that's completely untrue. While I have in the past posted silly comments calling myself "Bitchard Francis 'Buzz' Clack", as have others, I was not the person who posted as "Richard 'Buzz' Clark" in recent comments.Perhaps of more import, I unlike the "Hammy Sammy" spammer or the two at most mental defectives who are his co-conspirators in blatantly violating Part 97 rules on various repeaters as part of his obsessive and creepy obsession with KA6JMM and posting nonsense and ridiculousness to the Flamebook, don't post as other people and then post as "Hammy Sammy" as though I'm having a conversation with myself.But I can point out to those who might be interested quite a few instances [including the one that seemed to kick off the last two years of high-volume posting on the part of "Hammy Sammy" which, interestingly, hasn't resulted in all that much discussion other than that I've tried to engage in over the past few months; I keep forgetting that I'm not the target of the obsessive spamming - kind of the way the person posting keeps forgetting that the person who's attention he's attempting to get isn't here] of "conversation" that is likely taking place in the head of that poor, obsessive, delusional soul and pouring out to the Flamebook via his keyboard.In reply to "Did you know?" - who it turns out is the same as the previous "Did you know?" poster that I created and who is almost assuredly one of many Flamebook characters meant to provide to me a wide variety of names, aliases and appropriated call signs of others.Actually, 99% of what I post is laughably and more to the point, completely untrue. While I will just barely admit to have posted silly comments calling myself "Bitchard Francis 'Buzz' Clack", I steadfastly refuse to admit to all of my other Flamebook characters that share telling characteristics, vocabulary and obsession with certain 435 hams.Perhaps of more import, I have direct knowledge of KA6JMM’s jamming activities and those of his SWL mental defectives who are his co-conspirators in blatantly violating Part 97 rules on SPARC as part of JMM's defective and creepy obsession with BB & SPARC and also JMM's posting threatening nonsense and ridiculousness to Flamebook such as demanding apologies from BB.But I can point out to those who are interested there are quite a few instances [including the one that seemed to kick off the last four years of high-volume posting on the part of me, "Hammy Sammy"] which, interestingly, hasn't resulted in all that much discussion which I've desperately tried to engage in over the past few months; I keep forgetting that I'm not actually getting anyone to give a damn about my opinions - kind of the way I keep forgetting that the person who's identity I’m attempting to get for JMM isn't offering me a clue. Who knows what is taking place in the head of that poor, obsessive, delusional KA6JMM and pouring out into Flamebook as well as the Baofeng jamming of SPARC.In reply to the "Hammy Sammy" spammer appropriating my screen name who said: "I steadfastly refuse to admit to all of my other Flamebook characters that share tellingcharacteristics, vocabulary and obsession with certain 435 hams."I told you very early on that I'd used other names on the forum, and I told you that I would be glad to own up to any instances where I actually did so. It just so happens that your claim that I was posting as BUZ earlier wasn't the truth - like most things you accuse people of.As for this "obsession" you imagine I have with certain lowlife 435ers who have been troublemakers for years or decades, I'm hardly the first person to have problems with those people. In fact I'm probably way in the back of the line. And, as it happens, ALL of my criticism of those persons are 100% legitimate and can be backed up by pointing to numerous unaltered bits of audio posted online or activity that occurs daily and which you can find easily in the Broadcastify archives.
That, as differentiated from your claims about the obscure and by all legitimate accounts harmless ham in Wildomar/Lake Elsinore, none of which are backed up even by audio you've posted of that person.And, lastly, accusing others of being "obsessed" with this or that person simply because they've offered highly due and legitimate criticism of those people, is more of the same projection you typically engage in. At this point I'm sure it's not even something you're consciously doing, lost as you are in the obsession you have for that obscure ham who hurt your feelings sometime 5 or 10 years ago that you've never gotten over.But one more time, you come close to the heart of the matter when you said, "kind of the way I keep forgetting that the person who's identity I’m attempting to get for JMM isn't offering me a clue..."Of course you're saying nothing of value that proves any of your ridiculous claims nor are you providing any information that would explain why you're so vehemently and creepily obsessed with another man who, based on all available information, did nothing more to "harm" you other than not roll over and allow you to bully him. I'm well aware of that.It's still not clear who BB/KG6YGC is to you in that you're so eager to jump to his defense when he's legitimately criticized for taking out his frustration with the behavior of the "Dark Sleaze" on JMM, who isn't responsible for the jamming of people who follow him around from frequency to frequency, violating part 97 rules and failing to identify all to make trouble for someone they dislike. That said, it's understandable why a repeater owner wouldn't want to have to deal with those sorts of things; nevermind that SPARC has always been pretty good about finding out who is causing trouble for them.But on that point I've had a few discussions recently with people "in the know" who suggest that while JMM was annoyed with BB for asking him to leave SPARC that they've since settled their differences, that there is no real bad blood between them and that any feud between them over the matter as suggested by you is highly overblown. Whether that's true or not I haven't fully determined, but the testimony of people significantly more trustworthy than you - who have the guts to ID their stations - seems to point in that direction.As for this whole, "identity" thing... Well, you're just reaffirming what I've already deduced about you when I addressed your numerical list of points a while back - most of which were irrelevant chaff aside from points 7 & 14. I'm sure you don't care, lying blowhard that you are, that I am not personally acquainted with JMM, I've never conversed with him in person, on air or via any digital communications medium.More to the point, according to your blather he already knows who you are. Remember he "stalked" you. Or, more accurately, he caught you following him around and taking pictures of his property so you could post them online and harass him - for no legitimate reason at all - and then followed you and found personal information about you you carelessly discarded.Forget everything else, just tell me if you've taken my advice and looked into getting some help for your obvious mental defects? If you haven't, you really should. You've literally spent at least five years of your life whining on this website over a stupid ham radio feud that began with you not being able to deal with someone standing up to you for being a bully behind the microphone. That's extremely sad.In reply to "SPARC Superiors" And, if PHX is anything other than a complete retard….


435 Enforcement Team 
08/09

Comments:
Attention all:

- N6OGM followed Yellowbelly out to Murietta
- the “Buzz is a Gobblecock” guy has been tracked down
- the “go fuck yourself guy” has been tracked down

Next up: the “Oh Buzz, I’m gonna make a real man out of you” guy


Hammy Sammy 
08/09

Comments:
Quit cyberbullying me!


George Bebout 
08/09

Comments:
I just wanted to congratulate Rick on his third marriage (re-marriage) to his second ex-wife Anita. Wait. Did I get that right? Let's see..

Ramona P.; married then divorced
Anita B. ; married then divorced
Anita B. : married, third mistake, divorce to be announced soon

Yup, I got it right. Not bad for someone dead for 40 years! At least my second marriage lasted a long time. Both of my sons are losers but at least my daughter is a winner.


Anonymous 
08/09

Comments:
"YOUR NOT MAKING IT COCKSUCK"... I don't hear that that much anymore I wonder why. I know it was a recording but, "Break for the, "'YOUR NOT MAKING IT COCKSUCK"' jammer. Man that was a classic. LONG LIVE FUCKING 435 N 450


Squeaky 69 
08/09

Comments:
ZKZ is a model ham!

Dear Mr. Gobblecock -
Please keep tormenting Buzz.


My name is Steven 
08/08

Comments:
My name is Steven
I live in Northridge
Zipcode 91343

I am a stupid fuck and spam stupid imgur shit on Flamebook.

EXAMPLE: my name embedded in this image of the Amazon web page screenshot.

I spam lots of stupid pictures from imgur under lots of fake names but I live in Northridge.




Mr. Spock 
08/08

Comments:
Exit 25

If that lardass Hammy Sammy was a Boy Scout it is a sure thing he was diddled over and over by his scout master. All S-H does is go on and on and FUCKING ON about someone on Flamebook yapping about molestation. For Cristsake's...... go call those lawyers on TV who are suing BSA since you are so wound up about stupid shit on Flamebook. Fuuucccckkkk!


Butt Boy BB 
08/08

Comments:
When will the next SPARC jam-boree be held? Who won the Baofeng contest?


Buzz 
08/08

Comments:
Is a fat buck


Exit 25 
08/07

Comments:
Hammy Sammy must’ve been a Boy Scout. 😇


Buzz 
08/06

Comments:
Is a flat truck...


Break for James 
08/05

Comments:


Cys fucks kids 
08/04

Comments:
The pedo defenders popped their faggot heads out

Cys fucks kids
Pat sullivan fucks kids
Brad knw fucks kids

How do we know

Theyre Democrats and democrats fuck kids
If you dont believe that..

You probably fuck kids too


Squeaky 3 
08/04

Comments:
This is Francis buzz clark


Hammy Sammy 
08/04

Comments:
In reply to "Miss Piggy" who said:
"Child molesting accusations have been leveled against Jimmy, BB, Ham Sandwich, Roger, Perry, Johnny PHX, OG, the Martin's, etc."

I can't specifically remember any instance of such an allegation here, but I will take your word for it. To my knowledge, NONE of those people have ever been legitimately suspected of, charged with or convicted of any such act.

In point of fact, I'm only aware of two instances of an amateur radio operator being legitimately convicted of a sex crime against a child; one I can't remember the call-sign, but he actually had his license revoked due to outcry from the amateur radio community [a 7-call, if I remember correctly], and the other was a 4-call who'd last resided in FL who'd been convicted both there and in Arizona [and was listed in the FL sex offender registry], and he'd been suspected of criminal sex acts in the US Virgin Islands as well. He, thankfully, has been dead for a number of years. He was a 14.300/14.313 critter, and would have been right at home on 435.

In more recent years, another 14.313 scumbag, known for gleefully talking about how he planned to move to Puerto Rico or Jamaica and hook up with a "little Latina girl" [he was in his mid-60s at the time] was also charged with molesting his own stepdaughter, though that never went to trial. Because he felt he'd been railroaded - he said the ex-wife put the daughter up to the claim - he liked to go around calling others molesters. He, too, is dead and, if there's any cosmic justice, frying as we speak, lowlife that he was.

"It's almost a default move on the repeater or Flamebook if you don't agree with someone."

It actually seems to be something of a default attack across amateur radio, honestly. Frankly, I'm amazed that someone hasn't been successfully sued for it. Yes, legally amateur radio operators are limited purpose public figures, but it seems like a hard case to make that there is any way you can - absent a credible allegation, a criminal charge or a conviction - argue that you're NOT recklessly disregarding the truth if you accuse someone of being a child molester.

"I am not sure if repeater chat or Flamebook postings are taken that seriously."

Generally, they're not.

And, like you said, some of these other people have been so accused - but apparently so infrequently that I don't recall the comments.

By contrast, the "Snitchboi" spammer et al have made that false allegation about JMM dozens of times on this website - very likely while commenting using a VPN, TOR or some other sort of proxy server which masks their true IP address - and, obviously, without using their real name.

Anyone who would stoop to falsely accusing a person of that most vile of criminal acts over an amateur radio dispute is a lowlife of the highest order.


PAT THE PET O FILE 
08/04

Comments:
Instead of having a pet when he was a kid..
Pat chose to have a KID as a pet..
Pat the "pet" o phile
Pat loves "pets"

https://images.app.goo.gl/kBE8v9g6EXWExk9g9


Miss Piggy 
08/04

Comments:
Child molesting accusations have been leveled against Jimmy, BB, Ham Sandwich, Roger, Perry, Johnny PHX, OG, the Martin's, etc. It's almost a default move on the repeater or Flamebook if you don't agree with someone. I am not sure if repeater chat or Flamebook postings are taken that seriously.


Cys and pat 
08/04

Comments:
Cys fucks kids
Pat sullivan fucks kids
Democrats fuck kids
Those that support democrats..fuck kids.
Sit at home and fuck kids


WB6SUS 
08/04

Comments:
I heard that Roger is living with Tommy and Tammi Prager.
 < Previous 20
Page:
Next 20 >  

Back to THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK!

Contact administrator at flamebook@gmx.com